Skip to main content
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
vikasmahajan

Year Over Year Growth & MoM Growth % Calculation in QlikSense

HI all

I have to calculate  CY-LY/LY   Year wise (YOY) and MOM Wise . Dimension will be COMP -> Company & Year 

Attached QVF demo  file and excel.

Hope this resolve your issue.
If the issue is solved please mark the answer with Accept as Solution & like it.
If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
sunny_talwar

Hahahaha... did you even open this thread my friend? If you would have you would have not asked me to do something which I have already done....

Re: Year Over Year Growth & MoM Growth % Calculation in QlikSense

View solution in original post

6 Replies
vikasmahajan
Author

Sunny  can you please try and let me know

When Ascending Year

Sum(Sales)/Above(Sum(Sales)) - 1

When Descending Year

Sum(Sales)/Before(Sum(Sales)) - 1


Not able to get this ?


Vikas

Hope this resolve your issue.
If the issue is solved please mark the answer with Accept as Solution & like it.
If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.
sunny_talwar

Try this

Aggr(Sum(VolKL)/Above(Sum(VolKL)) - 1, COMP, (MonthYear, (NUMERIC)))

Capture.PNG

vikasmahajan
Author

Can you attach qvf  ?

Vikas

Hope this resolve your issue.
If the issue is solved please mark the answer with Accept as Solution & like it.
If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.
sunny_talwar

Hahahaha... did you even open this thread my friend? If you would have you would have not asked me to do something which I have already done....

Re: Year Over Year Growth & MoM Growth % Calculation in QlikSense

vikasmahajan
Author

Sorry Thanks

Vikas

Hope this resolve your issue.
If the issue is solved please mark the answer with Accept as Solution & like it.
If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.
sunny_talwar

No problem at all.... Please mark the response which is actually correct.

Thanks,

Sunny