Skip to main content
Announcements
Qlik Connect 2024! Seize endless possibilities! LEARN MORE
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

merging table fields

Hi,

Im fairly new to Qlikview so I imagine this is a very simple question.

I have loaded two worksheets from a spreadsheet into QV which display the same data but for two seperate organisations. One of the fields on each worksheet is a number for the cost of 21 different items but the heading for this is different on each worksheet e.g "Cost company 1" & "Cost company 2".

When I try to create a table in QV to show these items and their costs for each company it duplicates the item rows. how do I get one row for each item with the two costs shown next to it?

I currently have this:

ItemCost Company 1Cost Company 2
Item 1350
Item 1250
Item 2360
Item 2240

And would like this:

ItemCost Company 1Cost Company 2
Item 1350250
Item 2360240

Any help is greatly appreciated

Thanks

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Not applicable
Author

Im not too sure without looking at it...

Perhaps a simple concatenation would work better.

Could you post your file and let us take a look?

View solution in original post

6 Replies
Gysbert_Wassenaar

Looks like you concatenated your tables. Try using join instead. See http://community.qlik.com/thread/39177 for a bit more explanation on join, keep and concatenate.


talk is cheap, supply exceeds demand
Not applicable
Author

Thanks for the fast response.

That looks like exactly the problem. From looking at the thread you suggested I think I need an Outer Join. How do I make this happen? In the Script?

Thanks

Not applicable
Author

Do it in the script

Load Item

        [Cost Company 1]

From csv1

LEFT JOIN

Load Item

       [Cost Company 2]

From csv2

Or something like that...

Not applicable
Author

Hi,

Thanks for this.

LEFT JOIN just keeps company 1 value.

I almost need a LEFT & RIGHT JOIN dont I!!

Im probably doing something wrong. Apologies

Not applicable
Author

Im not too sure without looking at it...

Perhaps a simple concatenation would work better.

Could you post your file and let us take a look?

Not applicable
Author

Sorry for the delay

I have been trying to anonomyse the data due to the highly confidential nature of the data but when i do it works! which would obviously be no use.

I had originally thought it might be something to do with the item descriptions i have but have drawn a blank

I will continue to try and upload an anonomysed version for you to see

Thanks