Trying to find the lowest value per Dimension, possibly aggr()?

[Anonymous]

Hello,

I have a chart and I need to identify the lower Incentive value for each %ADAcctKey.

The Incentive value is a calculated value.  In the example below 445 would flag 10% and for 2544 the lowest flagged would be 0%.

%ADAcctKey	MetricDesc	QA	Adherence	Revenue	Saves	Level	Target	Incentive
445	QA	87.50%				Target	80% >=	10%
445	Adherence		88.04%			Target	88% >=	10%
2544	Save Rate				26.09%	Stretch	22% >=	20%
2544	QA	81.68%				Target	80% >=	15%
2544	Adherence		74.34%			Below	85% <	0%
2544	Revenue			$335.40		Below	$750 <	0%

Thank you for you help.

[alexandros17 · Accepted solution]

Use the following expression:

Aggr(Min(Incentive), %ADAcctKey)

[Anonymous]

That's the first thing I tried but I get blanks for all values.  I am wondering if it's because of the Incentive column and how or when it's calculated. 

With the below formula populating the Incentive column, would the values exist at the run time of the formula Aggr(Min(Incentive), %ADAcctKey)

Incentive =

if(QA=0,0,

if(Productivity=0,0,

if(Adherence=0,0,

if([Revenue]=0,0,

if(Saves=0,0,

AchievedIncentive)))))

[swuehl]

Maybe like this

=Min(Total<%ADAcctKey>

Aggr(

if(QA=0,0,

if(Productivity=0,0,

if(Adherence=0,0,

if([Revenue]=0,0,

if(Saves=0,0,

AchievedIncentive)))))

, %ADAcctKey, MetricDesc)

)

[Anonymous]

Swuehl thanks,

Still getting blanks.  I think I may need to do some remodeling to simplify some things.

[swuehl]

Ok, could you describe how your data model is built, and which dimensions and expressions you're using in the chart.

It would be very helpful if you could upload a small sample QVW that demonstrates your data and chart.

[Anonymous]

It's working but doing something very wrong.

So I have changed my model and it is now allowing me to calculate using the above formula but it's giving an odd result.

I am using the formula Aggr(Min(Achieved), %ADAcctKey) To Identify the Achieved Level by the agent.

Notice the Minimum Score to the right which shows that value of 0 as the lowest achieved and this is correct.  It is just on the incorrect line.  When I create a second chart to provide a list of agents lowest achieved level with only that row I now get incorrect rows.

%ADAcctKey	Category	IncentiveLevel	Achieved	Score	Minimum Score
37	Procuctivity	Stretch	0.2	0.888
37	QA	Target	0.15	91.74	0
37	Revenue	Threshold	0.05	1223.98
37	Adherence	Below	0	0.8454

The consistent part is that the value is placed on the first portion of our load script as seen below.  Notice how the first Metric loaded below in the Resident load is QA.  All the lowest values in the chart are displaying there.  When I moved QA to the bottom of the script, all scores then showed in the row for Adherence, the new first loaded.

/***[ Initial load where each agents score for all categories is in a single row]***/

load_IncentiveScores:

LOAD %ADAcctKey,

    AgentName,

    RoleShortDesc,

    RoleID,

    Procuctivity,

    Saves,

    QA,

    Adherence,

    Revenue

FROM

[Customer Care Incentive Extract.xls]

(biff, embedded labels, table is Sheet1$);

/***[ Each metric is then split out into a single column and later joined to the KPI range]***/

tmpIncentiveScores:

LOAD %ADAcctKey,

  RoleID & 2 as VariableKey,

    AgentName,

    RoleShortDesc,

    RoleID,

    QA as IncentiveScore,

    'QA' as IncentiveCategory

Resident load_IncentiveScores;

Concatenate(tmpIncentiveScores)

LOAD %ADAcctKey,

  RoleID & 2 as VariableKey,

    AgentName,

    RoleShortDesc,

    RoleID,

    Adherence as IncentiveScore,

    'Adherence' as IncentiveCategory

Resident load_IncentiveScores;

[ramoncova06]

have you tried using no distinct?

Aggr( nodistinct Min(Achieved), %ADAcctKey)

also why not use min(total <%ADAcctKey > Min(Achieved)) ? this tends to give you the same results that by using aggr but has better performance

[Anonymous]

Ramon,

Thank you for the help. 

The formula Aggr( nodistinct Min(Achieved), %ADAcctKey)  places the lowest value in all rows for the agent which will work but does not allow us to only display the single row.

With the formula min(total <%ADAcctKey > Min(Achieved)) I get all null values.  I am curious as to the need for the '<>' around <%ADAcctKey >.

Thanks again.

[ramoncova06]

sorry it should be min(total <%ADAcctKey > (Achieved))

the <> after a total does a grouping by that field