I am working on a QlikSense application which connects to a SharePoint Online list via a Rest Connector.  I need to be able to have a Query Header Name be "Authorization" and the Query Header Value set to an encryption key which will change daily.  See the highlighted section below for where I am hoping to use the variable.  Is it possible to use a variable in this field so that I do not have to manually go in every single day and set the new encryption key?  See the highlighted section below for where I am hoping to use the variable.

Hello everybody,

we performed the patching of the Qlik Sense Enterprise on Windows from version May 2021 to version November 2023 Patch 1 on our server according your recommendation.

But problem persist. 

I received information about the problem with renegotiation DoS Vulnerability from our IT department. See message below:

Hostname: qlik.xxx.ch,
Host Ip: 10.128.60.10,
Taskname: inf_DC1-PDPLEXA01,
Severity: Low,
Description: SSL/TLS: Renegotiation DoS Vulnerability (CVE-2011-1473, CVE-2011-5094)
Summary: The remote SSL/TLS service is prone to a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability.
Insight: The flaw exists because the remote SSL/TLS service does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols. Note: The referenced CVEs are affecting OpenSSL and Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) but both are in a DISPUTED state with the following rationale: > It can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment. Both CVEs are still kept in this VT as a reference to the origin of this flaw.
Solution: Users should contact their vendors for specific patch information. A general solution is to remove/disable renegotiation capabilities altogether from/in the affected SSL/TLS service.
Nvt: 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.117761
CVE: CVE-2011-1473, CVE-2011-5094>
Affected: Every SSL/TLS service which does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation.
Detection: Checks if the remote service allows to re-do the same SSL/TLS handshake (Renegotiation) over an existing / already established SSL/TLS connection.
Descriptions: The following indicates that the remote SSL/TLS service is affected:Protocol Version | Successful re-done SSL/TLS handshakes (Renegotiation) over an existing / already established SSL/TLS connection----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TLSv1.2 | 10
Soulution Type: VendorFix,
Reference: CVE-2011-1473; CVE-2011-5094; https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/wdg46VE_jkYBbgJ5yE4P9nQ-8IU/; https://orchilles.com/ssl-renegotiation-dos/; https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation; https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2

Hostname: qlik.xxx.ch,
Host Ip: 10.128.60.10,
Taskname: inf_DC1-PDPLEXA01,
Severity: High,
Description: MacOS X Finder .FBCIndex Information Disclosure
Summary: MacOS X creates a hidden file, '.FBCIndex' in each directory that has been viewed with the Finder. This file contains the content of the files present in the directory, giving an attacker information on the HTML tags, JavaScript, passwords, or any other sensitive word used inside those files.
Insight:
Solution: Block access to hidden files (starting with a dot) within your webservers configuration
Nvt: 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.10773
CVE: CVE-2001-1446>
Affected:
Detection:
Descriptions: The following files were identified:https://qlik.xxx.ch:4244/internal_forms_authentication/.FBCIndex
Soulution Type: Workaround,
Reference: CVE-2001-1446; http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3325; https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/177243

Does exist any solution for solving this problem?

Thank you,

Pavel

I have a set analysis function that limits the range of values shown on the horizontal (x)-axis of my chart.

I read about set analysis expressions and basically saw 2 options:

but, to me, this says me you either have to choose to ignore all selections or ignore nothing. I would like to be able to ignore specific selections. Is that possible?

example: I have the x-axis range defined by showing only the last 2 years of data. When I use Identifier 1, it works like I want to for the values shown on the x-axis. But then, none of the other selections has effect on the chart.

When I use identifier $ the chart is effect by every other selection I make, also for the periods on the x-axis.

I would like to have several filter to have effect on the chart, but not for the time period on the x-axis. That should always be the last  years.

Is this possible and how?

Buongiorno,

Come eseguire una selezione multipla su più elementi in un campo mediante un Pulsante ? (Azione: Seleziona nel Campo...)

Con Sense si mette il punto e virgola tra un elemento e l'altro, tra apici...ma in View non funziona...

Grazie, Maurizio

Created a density map layer with points however there is no lasso/selection option available to select and analyze the data points. When the same data is plotted using point layer lasso/selection is available.

I'm using qliksensedesktop 14:20:6

Documentation suggests that this should be an option for all the map layers and does not mention density as an exception.

Is it a bud that the selection option is not available for density layer?

Using a SQL Query on a SQL database returns the following data:

With the following result:

But executing the same SQL query into Qlikview returns the following:

toetsOnveranderd - Test with no change

toetsText - Using Text script formula to get text property

toetsJippo  - Self help method to force test property

With the following outcome in Qlikview:

It seems that the 'raw' data in the SQL database is 0965 (OneID,toetsOnveranderd)

But the SQL query in SQL returns (0965,965) (?)

And it seems that the script formula "Text" first identify the property is integer makes it a number and the concerts it to text 0965 -> 965 -> "965" 

[It must be noted that data input is from multiple sources into the SQL database].

This outcome of the usage of the the text formula vs 'raw' data causes a different result/outcome.

Any idea how to "fix" this?

Hi, there,

We need to give several Qlikview users certain admin privilege on our Qlikview DEV server. Here are what we have done so far:
1. Have a new AD group 'Qlikview DEV Admin' created and have users added into it.
2. On Qlikview DEV server, added 'Qlikview DEV Admin' into the 'Qlikview Administrator' group.
3. Created a new folder on Qlikview DEV server and assigned 'Qlikview DEV Admin' access to it.
4. In QMC (System -> Setup -> QDS -> General tab -> Source Folders section), added a new Path for the folder created in previous step.

It works, but there is one issue. In QMC -> Status -> Tasks, 'Qlikview DEV Admin' can see/run all tasks. But we only want them to see the tasks under one particular category (MRx_COAR in the attached image). Is it possible to do that?

Thanks