Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi all,
I have a field named sold_date and want to create another that is a boolean. 1 if sold_date is 2 years ago from today. The sold date format is MM/DD/YYYY in the sheet of Qlik.
I tried this but the new field is always 0.
if(Date#("sold_date", 'MM/DD/YYYY') = Date(MonthStart(Today(), -24)), 1, 0) as last_10d_2y,
Just in case, the script I have at the beginning of the load editor is this one:
SET ThousandSep=',';
SET DecimalSep='.';
SET MoneyThousandSep=',';
SET MoneyDecimalSep='.';
SET MoneyFormat='$ ###0.00;-$ ###0.00';
SET TimeFormat='h:mm:ss TT';
SET DateFormat='M/D/YYYY';
SET TimestampFormat='M/D/YYYY h:mm:ss[.fff] TT';
SET FirstWeekDay=6;
SET BrokenWeeks=1;
SET ReferenceDay=0;
SET FirstMonthOfYear=1;
SET CollationLocale='en-US';
SET CreateSearchIndexOnReload=1;
SET MonthNames='Jan;Feb;Mar;Apr;May;Jun;Jul;Aug;Sep;Oct;Nov;Dec';
SET LongMonthNames='January;February;March;April;May;June;July;August;September;October;November;December';
SET DayNames='Mon;Tue;Wed;Thu;Fri;Sat;Sun';
SET LongDayNames='Monday;Tuesday;Wednesday;Thursday;Friday;Saturday;Sunday';
SET NumericalAbbreviation='3:k;6:M;9:G;12:T;15:P;18:E;21:Z;24:Y;-3:m;-6:μ;-9:n;-12:p;-15:f;-18:a;-21:z;-24:y';
MANY THANKS!!
I am working on a QlikSense application which connects to a SharePoint Online list via a Rest Connector. I need to be able to have a Query Header Name be "Authorization" and the Query Header Value set to an encryption key which will change daily. See the highlighted section below for where I am hoping to use the variable. Is it possible to use a variable in this field so that I do not have to manually go in every single day and set the new encryption key? See the highlighted section below for where I am hoping to use the variable.
Hello everybody,
we performed the patching of the Qlik Sense Enterprise on Windows from version May 2021 to version November 2023 Patch 1 on our server according your recommendation.
But problem persist.
I received information about the problem with renegotiation DoS Vulnerability from our IT department. See message below:
Hostname: qlik.xxx.ch,
Host Ip: 10.128.60.10,
Taskname: inf_DC1-PDPLEXA01,
Severity: Low,
Description: SSL/TLS: Renegotiation DoS Vulnerability (CVE-2011-1473, CVE-2011-5094)
Summary: The remote SSL/TLS service is prone to a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability.
Insight: The flaw exists because the remote SSL/TLS service does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols. Note: The referenced CVEs are affecting OpenSSL and Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) but both are in a DISPUTED state with the following rationale: > It can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment. Both CVEs are still kept in this VT as a reference to the origin of this flaw.
Solution: Users should contact their vendors for specific patch information. A general solution is to remove/disable renegotiation capabilities altogether from/in the affected SSL/TLS service.
Nvt: 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.117761
CVE: CVE-2011-1473, CVE-2011-5094>
Affected: Every SSL/TLS service which does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation.
Detection: Checks if the remote service allows to re-do the same SSL/TLS handshake (Renegotiation) over an existing / already established SSL/TLS connection.
Descriptions: The following indicates that the remote SSL/TLS service is affected:Protocol Version | Successful re-done SSL/TLS handshakes (Renegotiation) over an existing / already established SSL/TLS connection----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TLSv1.2 | 10
Soulution Type: VendorFix,
Reference: CVE-2011-1473; CVE-2011-5094; https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/wdg46VE_jkYBbgJ5yE4P9nQ-8IU/; https://orchilles.com/ssl-renegotiation-dos/; https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation; https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2
Hostname: qlik.xxx.ch,
Host Ip: 10.128.60.10,
Taskname: inf_DC1-PDPLEXA01,
Severity: High,
Description: MacOS X Finder .FBCIndex Information Disclosure
Summary: MacOS X creates a hidden file, '.FBCIndex' in each directory that has been viewed with the Finder. This file contains the content of the files present in the directory, giving an attacker information on the HTML tags, JavaScript, passwords, or any other sensitive word used inside those files.
Insight:
Solution: Block access to hidden files (starting with a dot) within your webservers configuration
Nvt: 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.10773
CVE: CVE-2001-1446>
Affected:
Detection:
Descriptions: The following files were identified:https://qlik.xxx.ch:4244/internal_forms_authentication/.FBCIndex
Soulution Type: Workaround,
Reference: CVE-2001-1446; http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/3325; https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/177243
Does exist any solution for solving this problem?
Thank you,
Pavel
Hello,
We are displaying images of our products in a straight table using the image option released in August 2021. When we created a N Printing report, the image field displays as the image path. Are images in tables supported in N Printing?
In the past, we used a QlikView connection and used our product as a level and then added a report with images and a report with data. Is there a simpler way to do this? If not, will this same approach work in Qlik Sense?
I have a set analysis function that limits the range of values shown on the horizontal (x)-axis of my chart.
I read about set analysis expressions and basically saw 2 options:
Identifier | Description |
---|---|
1 | Represents the full set of all the records in the application, irrespective of any selections made. |
$ | Represents the records of the current selection. The set expression {$} is thus the equivalent to not stating a set expression. |
but, to me, this says me you either have to choose to ignore all selections or ignore nothing. I would like to be able to ignore specific selections. Is that possible?
example: I have the x-axis range defined by showing only the last 2 years of data. When I use Identifier 1, it works like I want to for the values shown on the x-axis. But then, none of the other selections has effect on the chart.
When I use identifier $ the chart is effect by every other selection I make, also for the periods on the x-axis.
I would like to have several filter to have effect on the chart, but not for the time period on the x-axis. That should always be the last years.
Is this possible and how?
Buongiorno,
Come eseguire una selezione multipla su più elementi in un campo mediante un Pulsante ? (Azione: Seleziona nel Campo...)
Con Sense si mette il punto e virgola tra un elemento e l'altro, tra apici...ma in View non funziona...
Grazie, Maurizio
Created a density map layer with points however there is no lasso/selection option available to select and analyze the data points. When the same data is plotted using point layer lasso/selection is available.
I'm using qliksensedesktop 14:20:6
Documentation suggests that this should be an option for all the map layers and does not mention density as an exception.
Is it a bud that the selection option is not available for density layer?
hi Everyone,
I am working on migration where i have to make a qvd from a pivot chart automatically which was possible qlik view from macros but I am not able to find any solution qlik sense
Please Help,
Using a SQL Query on a SQL database returns the following data:
With the following result:
But executing the same SQL query into Qlikview returns the following:
toetsOnveranderd - Test with no change
toetsText - Using Text script formula to get text property
toetsJippo - Self help method to force test property
With the following outcome in Qlikview:
It seems that the 'raw' data in the SQL database is 0965 (OneID,toetsOnveranderd)
But the SQL query in SQL returns (0965,965) (?)
And it seems that the script formula "Text" first identify the property is integer makes it a number and the concerts it to text 0965 -> 965 -> "965"
[It must be noted that data input is from multiple sources into the SQL database].
This outcome of the usage of the the text formula vs 'raw' data causes a different result/outcome.
Any idea how to "fix" this?
Wondering about Qlik Talend Data Integration Sessions? There are 11, in addition to all of the Data & Analytics. So meet us in Orlando, June 3 -5.
Browse our helpful how-to's to learn more about navigating Qlik Community and updating your profile.
Join us on April 24th at 10 AM ET for the next Do More with Qlik webinar focusing on Qlik’s Data Integration & Quality solutions.
Your journey awaits! Join us by Logging in and let the adventure begin.
Qlik enables a frictionless migration to AWS cloud by Empresas SB, a group of Chilean health and beauty retail companies employing 10,000 people with 600 points of sale.
Qlik Luminary Stephanie Robinson of JBS USA, the US arm of the global food company employing 70,000 in the US, and over 270,000 people worldwide.
Join one of our Location and Language groups. Find one that suits you today!
A private group is for healthcare organizations, partners, and Qlik healthcare staff to collaborate and share insights..
Qlik Communityの日本語のグループです。 Qlik製品に関する日本語資料のダウンロードや質問を日本語で投稿することができます。
Welcome to the group for Brazil users. .All discussions will be in Portuguese.
Hear from your Community team as they tell you about updates to the Qlik Community Platform and more!