<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Indexing for query performance? in Qlik Compose</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Compose/Indexing-for-query-performance/m-p/2430541#M1297</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd bet that the important part is choosing a naming convention that doesn't conflict with existing Compose indexes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I suppose this is what a dev environment is for, to try things like creating indexes to make sure they don't break anything...just reading "drop and recreate" gives me chills, remembering when I had to do that in production (before I had a dev environment...long story).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JacobTews</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-13T21:37:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Indexing for query performance?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Compose/Indexing-for-query-performance/m-p/2430536#M1295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, community!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know of any issues with manually creating indexes on tables in the data warehouse to speed query performance? I didn't want to run into problems where Compose sees an index on a table and is confused.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We're on-prem, SQL Server.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 20:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Compose/Indexing-for-query-performance/m-p/2430536#M1295</guid>
      <dc:creator>JacobTews</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-14T20:49:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Indexing for query performance?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Compose/Indexing-for-query-performance/m-p/2430540#M1296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We, too, are on prem sql server.&amp;nbsp; We've created a few indexes.&amp;nbsp; We created a naming convention that did not conflict with the existing indexes.&amp;nbsp; We created a daily SQL job that checks to see if the indexes are missing and will create them if they are.&amp;nbsp; If you do a drop and recreate of the DW, like we do periodically in our test environment, the daily sql job automatically takes care of it.&amp;nbsp; I can't recall if other modifications will drop all indexes, but we have this script running daily in prod and test environments just in case.&amp;nbsp; I'd just be careful not to add too many so you don't impact loading.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:23:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Compose/Indexing-for-query-performance/m-p/2430540#M1296</guid>
      <dc:creator>barbm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-13T21:23:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Indexing for query performance?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Compose/Indexing-for-query-performance/m-p/2430541#M1297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd bet that the important part is choosing a naming convention that doesn't conflict with existing Compose indexes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I suppose this is what a dev environment is for, to try things like creating indexes to make sure they don't break anything...just reading "drop and recreate" gives me chills, remembering when I had to do that in production (before I had a dev environment...long story).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:37:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Compose/Indexing-for-query-performance/m-p/2430541#M1297</guid>
      <dc:creator>JacobTews</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-13T21:37:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

