<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic C3650 vs C3850 in Qlik Learning Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Learning-Discussions/C3650-vs-C3850/m-p/816132#M2783</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot find any major difference between C3850 and &lt;A href="http://www.router-switch.com/Price-cisco-switches-cisco-switch-catalyst-3650_c129"&gt;C3650&lt;/A&gt; (I don't think the stack backplane speed difference matters, fixed vs modular uplink won't matter neither). And that makes me wonder which one I should choose to cover my needs (data, PoE voice, etc, etc) to have the investment protected. Not quite understand why Cisco introduce two product lines which are so close, and make me think which one Cisco will kill. Are you having, or had you faced the similar dilemma in the past? Could anyone give me a suggestion? Which would i to choose,3650 or 3850? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:56:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2015-01-20T02:56:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>C3650 vs C3850</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Learning-Discussions/C3650-vs-C3850/m-p/816132#M2783</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot find any major difference between C3850 and &lt;A href="http://www.router-switch.com/Price-cisco-switches-cisco-switch-catalyst-3650_c129"&gt;C3650&lt;/A&gt; (I don't think the stack backplane speed difference matters, fixed vs modular uplink won't matter neither). And that makes me wonder which one I should choose to cover my needs (data, PoE voice, etc, etc) to have the investment protected. Not quite understand why Cisco introduce two product lines which are so close, and make me think which one Cisco will kill. Are you having, or had you faced the similar dilemma in the past? Could anyone give me a suggestion? Which would i to choose,3650 or 3850? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:56:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Learning-Discussions/C3650-vs-C3850/m-p/816132#M2783</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-01-20T02:56:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C3650 vs C3850</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Learning-Discussions/C3650-vs-C3850/m-p/816133#M2784</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if this is the right place to post your question Kelly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe you should try the Discussion Forums.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Agis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 09:04:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Learning-Discussions/C3650-vs-C3850/m-p/816133#M2784</guid>
      <dc:creator>Agis-Kalogiannis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-20T09:04:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

