<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic feedback to qlik in Archived Groups</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Archived-Groups/feedback-to-qlik/m-p/8267#M393</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i would like to provide&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;feedback to qlik on how to improve things for the life of a qlik builder&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;an example of the type of feedback i could offer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. i have had this a number of times&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. when using a set instead of a let and there is a problem with the code, the problem is not reported the parser/interpreter just gives up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. set vVar='Appointments that were DNA'd';&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;... just gave up !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. realized i needed a set and not a let, so changed it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5. then got a usefull message&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6. fixed the problem and kept going ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is not a request for a feature&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyone aware of a way of getting this message direct to the tech guys @ qlik, cutting out all the beaurocracy ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:29:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cspindley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-22T14:29:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>feedback to qlik</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Archived-Groups/feedback-to-qlik/m-p/8267#M393</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i would like to provide&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;feedback to qlik on how to improve things for the life of a qlik builder&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;an example of the type of feedback i could offer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. i have had this a number of times&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. when using a set instead of a let and there is a problem with the code, the problem is not reported the parser/interpreter just gives up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. set vVar='Appointments that were DNA'd';&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;... just gave up !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. realized i needed a set and not a let, so changed it&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5. then got a usefull message&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6. fixed the problem and kept going ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this is not a request for a feature&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyone aware of a way of getting this message direct to the tech guys @ qlik, cutting out all the beaurocracy ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:29:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Archived-Groups/feedback-to-qlik/m-p/8267#M393</guid>
      <dc:creator>cspindley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-22T14:29:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

