<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Need For Speed on Resident Load in Suggest an Idea</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idi-p/1618939</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let's mix that :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 189px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18243i50D826228A16210F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And that :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 281px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18244iCCDF4E007A56942E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ok, more seriously : we all know that on large tables, resident load (that loads a table already loaded in RAM) is not fast.. or at least less than a qvd load(that loads a table store on a disk!!). This is counter-intuitive and we can suspect there is a huge room for improvement here.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Simon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>simonaubert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-11-25T15:12:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Need For Speed on Resident Load</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idi-p/1618939</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let's mix that :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 189px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18243i50D826228A16210F/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And that :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 281px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/18244iCCDF4E007A56942E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ok, more seriously : we all know that on large tables, resident load (that loads a table already loaded in RAM) is not fast.. or at least less than a qvd load(that loads a table store on a disk!!). This is counter-intuitive and we can suspect there is a huge room for improvement here.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Simon&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 15:12:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idi-p/1618939</guid>
      <dc:creator>simonaubert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-25T15:12:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need For Speed on Resident Load - Status changed to: Unspecified</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idc-p/1651109#M529</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 21:13:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idc-p/1651109#M529</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-25T21:13:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need For Speed on Resident Load - Status changed to: Open - New</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idc-p/1669518#M530</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 11:53:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idc-p/1669518#M530</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_Teichman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-27T11:53:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need For Speed on Resident Load - Status changed to: Open - Not Planned</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idc-p/1671137#M531</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you for this idea. While it is something that could be quite interesting, we do not plan to address this on the product roadmap. We will continue to re-evaluate our priorities and strategic direction to see if this can fit in.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2020 06:07:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idc-p/1671137#M531</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_Teichman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-31T06:07:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need For Speed on Resident Load - Status changed to: Closed - Archived</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idc-p/2052655#M12273</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Archiving due to relevance &amp;amp; time. If this idea is still relevant, please resubmit it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Meghann&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 17:22:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/Need-For-Speed-on-Resident-Load/idc-p/2052655#M12273</guid>
      <dc:creator>Meghann_MacDonald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-23T17:22:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

