<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea SQL Hashbyte - Add equivalent to Qlik in Suggest an Idea</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/SQL-Hashbyte-Add-equivalent-to-Qlik/idi-p/1940383</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Could not find the this Idea already, so I created it. Was searching for a way to encrypt text with sha160 and found this community article&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/Ideation-Discussions/SHA256-in-Qlik-Sense/td-p/1801497" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.qlik.com/t5/Ideation-Discussions/SHA256-in-Qlik-Sense/td-p/1801497&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Background Info:&lt;BR /&gt;We would like to combine archived data from a specific SQL server (where some fields are already encrypted by sha160 (or sha) with data from the production SQL server, where the data is not already encrypted. As far as I could tell, the existing hash160() function does use a different algorithm.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It would be nice to add a new funcion, similar to the Hashbyte in SQL, where you can chose between the differenz SHA + MDX algorithms.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:45:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marc_behrens</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-26T12:45:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Hashbyte - Add equivalent to Qlik</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/SQL-Hashbyte-Add-equivalent-to-Qlik/idi-p/1940383</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could not find the this Idea already, so I created it. Was searching for a way to encrypt text with sha160 and found this community article&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/Ideation-Discussions/SHA256-in-Qlik-Sense/td-p/1801497" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.qlik.com/t5/Ideation-Discussions/SHA256-in-Qlik-Sense/td-p/1801497&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Background Info:&lt;BR /&gt;We would like to combine archived data from a specific SQL server (where some fields are already encrypted by sha160 (or sha) with data from the production SQL server, where the data is not already encrypted. As far as I could tell, the existing hash160() function does use a different algorithm.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It would be nice to add a new funcion, similar to the Hashbyte in SQL, where you can chose between the differenz SHA + MDX algorithms.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:45:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/SQL-Hashbyte-Add-equivalent-to-Qlik/idi-p/1940383</guid>
      <dc:creator>marc_behrens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-26T12:45:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From now on, please track this idea from the Ideation por...</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/SQL-Hashbyte-Add-equivalent-to-Qlik/idc-p/2113643#M15277</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;From now on, please track this idea from the Ideation portal.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A title="Link to new idea" href="https://ideation.qlik.com/app/#/case/281236" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Link to new idea&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Meghann&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;NOTE: Upon clicking this link 2 tabs may open - please feel free to close the one with a login page. If you &lt;STRONG&gt;only&lt;/STRONG&gt; see 1 tab with the login page, please try clicking this link first: &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A title="Authenticate me!" href="#" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Authenticate me!&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;t&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;EM&gt;hen try the link above again. Ensure pop-up blocker is off.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:15:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/SQL-Hashbyte-Add-equivalent-to-Qlik/idc-p/2113643#M15277</guid>
      <dc:creator>Meghann_MacDonald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-05T13:15:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SQL Hashbyte - Add equivalent to Qlik - Status changed to: Closed - Archived</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/SQL-Hashbyte-Add-equivalent-to-Qlik/idc-p/2113644#M15278</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:15:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Suggest-an-Idea/SQL-Hashbyte-Add-equivalent-to-Qlik/idc-p/2113644#M15278</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ideation</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-05T13:15:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

