<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Regarding Oracle SQL*Loader's Direct-Path INSERT. in Qlik Replicate</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/Regarding-Oracle-SQL-Loader-s-Direct-Path-INSERT/m-p/2551612#M16446</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/142280"&gt;@iti-attunity-sup&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In short, as long as those changes are captured in the redo log, Qlik Replicate can read them. Therefore, the core requirement lies on the Oracle side rather than Qlik Replicate.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When the customer performs a direct-path insert, a huge volume of changes is generated in the redo log. This will impose a heavy load on both the Oracle DB and Qlik Replicate, which will temporarily cause high source latency.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Desmond&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 04:26:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DesmondWOO</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-06-18T04:26:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Regarding Oracle SQL*Loader's Direct-Path INSERT.</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/Regarding-Oracle-SQL-Loader-s-Direct-Path-INSERT/m-p/2551505#M16434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Support Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope you are doing well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to clarify the recommended settings when the source database uses Oracle SQL*Loader's Direct-Path INSERT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My understanding is that because Oracle SQL*Loader's Direct-Path INSERT writes blocks directly to the disk without going through the buffer cache,&lt;BR /&gt;it does not generate REDO logs or archive log files.&lt;BR /&gt;Therefore, if we want to ensure REDO logs are generated, we need to either enable the table's LOGGING setting or switch to FORCE LOGGING mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on this, I assumed that Qlik Replicate would not be able to perform CDC on data inserted into the source DB via Oracle SQL*Loader's Direct-Path INSERT.&lt;BR /&gt;However, upon reviewing the limitations, I could not find any specific limitations or recommendations regarding Direct-Path INSERT.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any recommended settings on the source Oracle database side when using Oracle SQL*Loader's Direct-Path INSERT?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 04:34:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/Regarding-Oracle-SQL-Loader-s-Direct-Path-INSERT/m-p/2551505#M16434</guid>
      <dc:creator>iti-attunity-sup</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-17T04:34:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Oracle SQL*Loader's Direct-Path INSERT.</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/Regarding-Oracle-SQL-Loader-s-Direct-Path-INSERT/m-p/2551508#M16436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Support Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on our internal verification, data was successfully synchronized when the table's LOGGING setting was set to YES.&lt;BR /&gt;However, when the table's LOGGING setting was set to NO, the data could not be synchronized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aside from verifying whether the table's LOGGING setting is set to YES,&lt;BR /&gt;are there any other potential impacts on CDC or points of caution (such as limitations or concerns) that we should be aware of when using Oracle SQL*Loader's Direct-Path INSERT?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 05:48:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/Regarding-Oracle-SQL-Loader-s-Direct-Path-INSERT/m-p/2551508#M16436</guid>
      <dc:creator>iti-attunity-sup</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-17T05:48:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding Oracle SQL*Loader's Direct-Path INSERT.</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/Regarding-Oracle-SQL-Loader-s-Direct-Path-INSERT/m-p/2551612#M16446</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/142280"&gt;@iti-attunity-sup&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In short, as long as those changes are captured in the redo log, Qlik Replicate can read them. Therefore, the core requirement lies on the Oracle side rather than Qlik Replicate.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When the customer performs a direct-path insert, a huge volume of changes is generated in the redo log. This will impose a heavy load on both the Oracle DB and Qlik Replicate, which will temporarily cause high source latency.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Desmond&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 04:26:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/Regarding-Oracle-SQL-Loader-s-Direct-Path-INSERT/m-p/2551612#M16446</guid>
      <dc:creator>DesmondWOO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-06-18T04:26:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

