<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DDL changes on DB2 LUW in Qlik Replicate</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/DDL-changes-on-DB2-LUW/m-p/1923933#M2513</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/124114"&gt;@Abrie_M&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;For some sources(like DB2 LUW and Postgres etc.,), Replicate can't capture the exact timestamp( due to source limitations) when we start the task for the first time or stop and resume the task. So Replicate record that uncaptured time stamp as &lt;EM&gt;1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The good news is that Replicate overcome this issue for the Postgres source by adding&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;the last commit timestamp to the stream position and we can provide a workaround how to handle the remaining situations where the replicate still maintains the timestamp as&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;If you create a case listing the problems then R&amp;amp;D will revisit DB2 source limitations related to these timestamp issues.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Swathi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SwathiPulagam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-28T12:19:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DDL changes on DB2 LUW</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/DDL-changes-on-DB2-LUW/m-p/1923920#M2512</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good day&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;From the Replicate documentation:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;When the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="ui_item"&gt;Change table&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;option is enabled in the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN class="ui_item"&gt;Store Changes Settings&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;tab, the first timestamp record in the table may be Zero in some cases (i.e. 1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've also found that when a CDC task is stopped and resumed, the first DDL record also have the 1970 timestamp. This means that Compose does not pick up the DDL changes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Abrie_M_0-1651146119682.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/78171i8EB281A3688F4837/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Abrie_M_0-1651146119682.png" alt="Abrie_M_0-1651146119682.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As it is normal behavior for tasks to be stopped/resumed (server maintenance, etc), would one assume that CDC with schema evolution does not work for a DB2 LUW endpoint?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone found a workaround for this?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanx&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Abrie&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 11:45:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/DDL-changes-on-DB2-LUW/m-p/1923920#M2512</guid>
      <dc:creator>Abrie_M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-28T11:45:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DDL changes on DB2 LUW</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/DDL-changes-on-DB2-LUW/m-p/1923933#M2513</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/124114"&gt;@Abrie_M&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;For some sources(like DB2 LUW and Postgres etc.,), Replicate can't capture the exact timestamp( due to source limitations) when we start the task for the first time or stop and resume the task. So Replicate record that uncaptured time stamp as &lt;EM&gt;1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; The good news is that Replicate overcome this issue for the Postgres source by adding&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;the last commit timestamp to the stream position and we can provide a workaround how to handle the remaining situations where the replicate still maintains the timestamp as&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;1970-01-01 00:00:00.000000&lt;/EM&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;If you create a case listing the problems then R&amp;amp;D will revisit DB2 source limitations related to these timestamp issues.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Swathi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Qlik-Replicate/DDL-changes-on-DB2-LUW/m-p/1923933#M2513</guid>
      <dc:creator>SwathiPulagam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-28T12:19:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

