<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Intel E5-2667v3 - already whitelisted? in Scalability</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Scalability/Intel-E5-2667v3-already-whitelisted/m-p/679192#M417</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The last "Qlik Scalability Center Server Whitelist" I have found is from May 2014.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since then Intel has released the E5-2667v3. From the specs it looks better than the E5.2690v2 with higher clock speed (3.2 GHz over 3 GHz) and support for DDR4 2133&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has someone at scalability center already tested this CPU? We get the first requests to deploy these type of machines!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roland&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:52:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-08T08:52:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Intel E5-2667v3 - already whitelisted?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Scalability/Intel-E5-2667v3-already-whitelisted/m-p/679192#M417</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;HI!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The last "Qlik Scalability Center Server Whitelist" I have found is from May 2014.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since then Intel has released the E5-2667v3. From the specs it looks better than the E5.2690v2 with higher clock speed (3.2 GHz over 3 GHz) and support for DDR4 2133&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has someone at scalability center already tested this CPU? We get the first requests to deploy these type of machines!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Roland&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 08:52:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Scalability/Intel-E5-2667v3-already-whitelisted/m-p/679192#M417</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-08T08:52:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Intel E5-2667v3 - already whitelisted?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Scalability/Intel-E5-2667v3-already-whitelisted/m-p/679193#M418</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Roland, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have not tested servers with this CPU model. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The specs show couple of differences in comparison to v2: higher clock speed, higher speed for QPI links and as you mentioned supports for DDR4. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is important is that usually CPUs with higher clock frequency have less cores and this is also the case for E5-2690 v1 (10 cores) vs E5-2667 v3 (8 cores). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the moment we do not have information how servers with this CPU model perform. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 14:39:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Scalability/Intel-E5-2667v3-already-whitelisted/m-p/679193#M418</guid>
      <dc:creator>PawelF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-14T14:39:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

