<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Concatenate Tables With Field Using Dual and Match Functions in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474648#M100052</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Another note.&amp;nbsp; The field I am using that represents the smaller set (COMBINED_BUSINESS_UNIT) is actually not pulling from the field where the function is being done.&amp;nbsp; It is another field in a different table that has the Dual(Match) function applied.&amp;nbsp; Do they have to happen in the same load like autonumber?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 18:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shannonmarshall329</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-05T18:49:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Concatenate Tables With Field Using Dual and Match Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474597#M100045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I am trying to concatenate two tables together and one of the fields uses a Dual/Match function to set the order of the data during the load.&amp;nbsp; When I load the data the field in the first table shows correctly, however, the data in the second table gives me the numeric value instead of the character value.&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know what might be causing this and if there is a way to get the character values to show for both loads?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 14:29:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474597#M100045</guid>
      <dc:creator>shannonmarshall329</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-05T14:29:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concatenate Tables With Field Using Dual and Match Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474645#M100050</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you applying the function in both load statements? Can you post the load statement?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Rob&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 18:29:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474645#M100050</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwunderlich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-05T18:29:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concatenate Tables With Field Using Dual and Match Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474647#M100051</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Rob, here is the load statement for both fields that are in a transform qvd.&amp;nbsp; Just noticing that the statements are not identical.&amp;nbsp; Do they need to be or can I just update so the order of the bigger one matches the order of the smaller one and add the extra values at the end?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;DUAL(COMBINED_BUSINESS_UNIT_TEMP,&lt;BR /&gt;Match(COMBINED_BUSINESS_UNIT_TEMP,'PRS','HRMO','PRM','DAC','PCO','CRD','UXD','OPS','ASD','ITS','CNE','MAT','MWT','STH',&lt;BR /&gt;'WST','DSMC','AWQ','CCM','DAU','EID','FLD','HCI','PLD','WLD','UNKNOWN')) AS COMBINED_BUSINESS_UNIT,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;DUAL([Emp_Region_Code_Temp], MATCH([Emp_Region_Code_Temp],'PRS','HRMO','PPL','PRM','CLO','DAC','PCO','CRD','UXD','MKR','PLD','GLT','LTC','FLD','LCI','WLD','EID',&lt;BR /&gt;'OPS','CDS','ASD','ITS','CNE','MAT','MWT','STH','WST','DSC','DSMC','LKR','CCM','HCI','AWC','UNK','AWQ','TES','Centrally Managed',&lt;BR /&gt;'DACM Student Travel','CIVP', 'RES','LIB','LPT','000','APS','DAU','UNKNOWN')) as [Emp Region Code]&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 18:44:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474647#M100051</guid>
      <dc:creator>shannonmarshall329</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-05T18:44:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concatenate Tables With Field Using Dual and Match Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474648#M100052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Another note.&amp;nbsp; The field I am using that represents the smaller set (COMBINED_BUSINESS_UNIT) is actually not pulling from the field where the function is being done.&amp;nbsp; It is another field in a different table that has the Dual(Match) function applied.&amp;nbsp; Do they have to happen in the same load like autonumber?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 18:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474648#M100052</guid>
      <dc:creator>shannonmarshall329</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-05T18:49:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concatenate Tables With Field Using Dual and Match Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474683#M100054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If your intent is to assign a consistent numeric value for sorting, then I would say it is "wrong" to have the two lists having different number of elements and/or in a different order.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If your intent is to establish a sort order with this many values, you may find loading a temp table to be easier&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://qlikviewcookbook.com/2012/11/establishing-a-sort-order/" target="_blank"&gt;https://qlikviewcookbook.com/2012/11/establishing-a-sort-order/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For Qlik Sense, "load order" in a chart means to uncheck all the sorting check boxes. In those circumstances where you must use a sort expression, you can use the function&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;FieldIndex('fieldname', fieldname)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rwunderlich_0-1722916408435.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/170243i7FAA6FDC777F92CB/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="rwunderlich_0-1722916408435.png" alt="rwunderlich_0-1722916408435.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-Rob&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.easyqlik.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.easyqlik.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://masterssummit.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://masterssummit.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://qlikviewcookbook.com" target="_blank"&gt;http://qlikviewcookbook.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2024 03:57:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2474683#M100054</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwunderlich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-06T03:57:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Concatenate Tables With Field Using Dual and Match Functions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2475815#M100189</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Rob, thanks for the suggestion&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:34:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Concatenate-Tables-With-Field-Using-Dual-and-Match-Functions/m-p/2475815#M100189</guid>
      <dc:creator>shannonmarshall329</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-12T11:34:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

