<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: load time databricks in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/load-time-databricks/m-p/2517186#M105887</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply. I am basically looking for reduce the load from databricks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you say delta mode, are you talking about incremental load. In this case there is no modification date in the table so incremental load is not possible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 18:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jjustingkm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-08T18:59:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>load time databricks</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/load-time-databricks/m-p/2517068#M105868</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to load a big table from databricks around 100 million records and is taking around 1.5 hours.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Needed the detail data in the sheet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if we load the data into a QVD, would it make any difference in the load time ( I know that loading into a table and QVD both needs to hit the database).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 01:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/load-time-databricks/m-p/2517068#M105868</guid>
      <dc:creator>jjustingkm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-08T01:52:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: load time databricks</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/load-time-databricks/m-p/2517081#M105874</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes the best solution in your case is to load from databricks in delta mode and store data into QVD.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can split QVD.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Load from QVD is faster in Qlik and your records will be load in few minutes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 06:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/load-time-databricks/m-p/2517081#M105874</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulcalvet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-08T06:53:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: load time databricks</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/load-time-databricks/m-p/2517186#M105887</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply. I am basically looking for reduce the load from databricks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you say delta mode, are you talking about incremental load. In this case there is no modification date in the table so incremental load is not possible.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 18:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/load-time-databricks/m-p/2517186#M105887</guid>
      <dc:creator>jjustingkm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-08T18:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

