<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic On Demand App Generation ODAG - Text Format Bindings in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/On-Demand-App-Generation-ODAG-Text-Format-Bindings/m-p/26538#M1819</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, Does anyone know if there is a restriction on the format of binding values? We have noticed that numerical works better than text, and wanted to confirm? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 15:14:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cmorri1988</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-29T15:14:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>On Demand App Generation ODAG - Text Format Bindings</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/On-Demand-App-Generation-ODAG-Text-Format-Bindings/m-p/26538#M1819</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello, Does anyone know if there is a restriction on the format of binding values? We have noticed that numerical works better than text, and wanted to confirm? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 15:14:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/On-Demand-App-Generation-ODAG-Text-Format-Bindings/m-p/26538#M1819</guid>
      <dc:creator>cmorri1988</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-29T15:14:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

