<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Poor ColorMix Function Performance following v.3.0.1 upgrade in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Poor-ColorMix-Function-Performance-following-v-3-0-1-upgrade/m-p/1190785#M22347</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have upgraded the version to 3.0.1 but dont see any differences, can you attach some sample apps or images related to this ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lakshmikandh &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:00:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lakshmikandh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-24T11:00:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poor ColorMix Function Performance following v.3.0.1 upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Poor-ColorMix-Function-Performance-following-v-3-0-1-upgrade/m-p/1190783#M22345</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Following an upgrade from 2.0.9 to 3.0.1, I am experiencing very poor performance of the ColorMix1 function.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;I know the expression is a bit complicated, checking for values &amp;gt;1, then between 0 and 1, then less than 0, and performing colormixes in between, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;but the amount of data I have is very small, and prior to the upgrade it performed flawlessly.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did Qlik change the way colors were processed in the 3.0.1 release?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;Has anyone else experienced these kind of issues?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333px;"&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:19:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Poor-ColorMix-Function-Performance-following-v-3-0-1-upgrade/m-p/1190783#M22345</guid>
      <dc:creator>scjoel02</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-22T19:19:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor ColorMix Function Performance following v.3.0.1 upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Poor-ColorMix-Function-Performance-following-v-3-0-1-upgrade/m-p/1190784#M22346</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Joel,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my understanding Colormix function is working as same as earlier . Now , In your case its all about data . You can check in previous version of &lt;STRONG&gt;Consumer Sales&lt;/STRONG&gt; App which comes by default , On first sheet the three bar charts have same function and same GUI.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please mark the appropriate replies as CORRECT / HELPFUL so our team and other members know that your question(s) has been answered to your satisfaction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rohit Kumar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 08:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Poor-ColorMix-Function-Performance-following-v-3-0-1-upgrade/m-p/1190784#M22346</guid>
      <dc:creator>rohitk1609</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-24T08:17:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor ColorMix Function Performance following v.3.0.1 upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Poor-ColorMix-Function-Performance-following-v-3-0-1-upgrade/m-p/1190785#M22347</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have upgraded the version to 3.0.1 but dont see any differences, can you attach some sample apps or images related to this ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lakshmikandh &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:00:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Poor-ColorMix-Function-Performance-following-v-3-0-1-upgrade/m-p/1190785#M22347</guid>
      <dc:creator>lakshmikandh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-24T11:00:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor ColorMix Function Performance following v.3.0.1 upgrade</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Poor-ColorMix-Function-Performance-following-v-3-0-1-upgrade/m-p/1190786#M22348</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ColorMix1() function expects a number between 0 and 1 as first argument and I can't see a reason why the performance of color mapping should have degraded.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Reading your post, I think your expression is more complicated (i.e. the matching of your value you want to map against ranges "&amp;gt;1", "&amp;lt;0" and "inbetween 0 and 1" may include some complex repeated calculations) and maybe the performance of your value calculation has degraded.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you at least post your complete, full expression you are using as color expression?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:44:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Poor-ColorMix-Function-Performance-following-v-3-0-1-upgrade/m-p/1190786#M22348</guid>
      <dc:creator>swuehl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-24T11:44:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

