<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: P() and E() in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/P-and-E/m-p/1519563#M37129</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have never tested to compare their performances. However, I guess if there is a winner, then it should be the p() because that is explicit.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 04:52:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-12T04:52:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>P() and E()</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/P-and-E/m-p/1519540#M37127</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was wondering if anyone knows if using P() or E() is faster holding all else equal.&amp;nbsp; Basically I have the option use an expression sum({&amp;lt;[ID] = E({&amp;lt;[Include Flag] = {'0'}&amp;gt;}ID)&amp;gt;}Sales) or &lt;SPAN&gt;sum({&amp;lt;[ID] = P({&amp;lt;[Include Flag] = {'1'}&amp;gt;}ID)&amp;gt;}Sales) and am wondering if one is better than the other.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Mark&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 23:43:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/P-and-E/m-p/1519540#M37127</guid>
      <dc:creator>m_perreault</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-11T23:43:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P() and E()</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/P-and-E/m-p/1519563#M37129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have never tested to compare their performances. However, I guess if there is a winner, then it should be the p() because that is explicit.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 04:52:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/P-and-E/m-p/1519563#M37129</guid>
      <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T04:52:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P() and E()</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/P-and-E/m-p/1519580#M37131</link>
      <description>YMMV - you need to test this with your particular data set as that may influence which expression is quicker (if any).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 05:45:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/P-and-E/m-p/1519580#M37131</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonathandienst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T05:45:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: P() and E()</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/P-and-E/m-p/1519728#M37138</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Like the others I never made systematically testings to compare the performance of p() and e(). But if I would do a numerical check and using 0 or 1 instead of '0' or '1'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Beside this I would also try if the flag couldn't be used more directly to filter/calculate the right data. I mean something like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;sum(Sales * [Include Flag])&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 10:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/P-and-E/m-p/1519728#M37138</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-12T10:34:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

