<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Help with Table Joins in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Help-with-Table-Joins/m-p/1540730#M40177</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;HI Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you look at my data modelling in the attached file, i need a way to map REgion field in SUB_Region table and REgion 1 field in COS table without disturbing other joins and not encounter circular reference problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a smart way of doing that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the advice.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 09:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ramanarayan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-07T09:43:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Help with Table Joins</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Help-with-Table-Joins/m-p/1540730#M40177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI Experts,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you look at my data modelling in the attached file, i need a way to map REgion field in SUB_Region table and REgion 1 field in COS table without disturbing other joins and not encounter circular reference problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a smart way of doing that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the advice.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 09:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Help-with-Table-Joins/m-p/1540730#M40177</guid>
      <dc:creator>ramanarayan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-07T09:43:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Help with Table Joins</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Help-with-Table-Joins/m-p/1540750#M40178</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't believe that you could easily bypass the missing/wrong linking of both tables else that you need to rethink your datamodel and maybe merge both tables together and/or to integrate them (partly) into your main-table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 09:58:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Help-with-Table-Joins/m-p/1540750#M40178</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-07T09:58:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

