<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Memory problems with 'order by' in upload scripts in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Memory-problems-with-order-by-in-upload-scripts/m-p/1578154#M42121</link>
    <description>Using the Autonumber function to replace your composite keys may help</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa_P</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-09T00:00:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Memory problems with 'order by' in upload scripts</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Memory-problems-with-order-by-in-upload-scripts/m-p/1577533#M42077</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a problem with record order in some app in my data model. After some data upload in a new version of an app I see that new app's memory change with differrents records orders in the app's linktable (linktable contains every key that I have in the tables of this app). I try to upload the same linktable in different version of this app and after some tests I find the problem. The memory gap between these different version of the same app is due to a different order by put in the record of linktable at the moment of linktable upload in these app.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone know if there are any rules that determines what is the best way to order records in a table for econimize memory in app? Or some of you have a response or any idea about?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:54:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Memory-problems-with-order-by-in-upload-scripts/m-p/1577533#M42077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark94</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-16T05:54:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory problems with 'order by' in upload scripts</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Memory-problems-with-order-by-in-upload-scripts/m-p/1578154#M42121</link>
      <description>Using the Autonumber function to replace your composite keys may help</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Memory-problems-with-order-by-in-upload-scripts/m-p/1578154#M42121</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lisa_P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-09T00:00:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory problems with 'order by' in upload scripts</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Memory-problems-with-order-by-in-upload-scripts/m-p/1578239#M42134</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you but we have already used Autonumber and we saw that app memory changes basing on diffent fields using for the 'order by' function, it's a very strange thing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2019 07:35:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Memory-problems-with-order-by-in-upload-scripts/m-p/1578239#M42134</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark94</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-09T07:35:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

