<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Aggr Sum Distinct clause in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580472#M42386</link>
    <description>Why do you need aggr there.&lt;BR /&gt;below expression will work for what you have shown above&lt;BR /&gt;Sum({&amp;lt;success_login={1}&amp;gt;}success_login)</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 13:47:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dplr-rn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-15T13:47:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Aggr Sum Distinct clause</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580434#M42380</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assume the following arbitrary dataset:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;success_login, personid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1, P1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1, P1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1, P1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0, P1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1, P2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0, P2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0, P2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I want is to use a solid statement that calculates the aggregated sum over success_login. As such, the end result would be this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;success_login, personid, logins&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,P1,3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1,P2,1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I already tried it with&amp;nbsp;=Aggr(Sum(success_login), personid). Which doesn't filter out the zeros (0). Using set analysis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;=Aggr(Sum({1&amp;lt;success_login={1}&amp;gt;}), personid) gives me blank output.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's wrong with my approach?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580434#M42380</guid>
      <dc:creator>klikgevoel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-16T20:51:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggr Sum Distinct clause</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580467#M42384</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why don't you just do that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dimensions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;sucess_login
person_id&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Expression&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;Sum(success_login)&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 13:42:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580467#M42384</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunny_talwar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-15T13:42:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggr Sum Distinct clause</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580472#M42386</link>
      <description>Why do you need aggr there.&lt;BR /&gt;below expression will work for what you have shown above&lt;BR /&gt;Sum({&amp;lt;success_login={1}&amp;gt;}success_login)</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 13:47:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580472#M42386</guid>
      <dc:creator>dplr-rn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-15T13:47:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggr Sum Distinct clause</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580509#M42398</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Apparently the answer is not so trivial in my situation due to the underlying data model. Second, apparently I had to employ some extra dimensions in my Table to get the actual values to appear.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 14:40:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580509#M42398</guid>
      <dc:creator>klikgevoel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-15T14:40:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggr Sum Distinct clause</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580512#M42399</link>
      <description>Share details of the problem with appropriate sample data and we can try to help</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 14:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580512#M42399</guid>
      <dc:creator>dplr-rn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-15T14:41:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Aggr Sum Distinct clause</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580520#M42400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;try to use count&lt;SPAN&gt;({&amp;lt;success_login={1}&amp;gt;})personid).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2019 14:52:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Aggr-Sum-Distinct-clause/m-p/1580520#M42400</guid>
      <dc:creator>jwang2016</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-15T14:52:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

