<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Link Table in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Link-Table/m-p/1509124#M44070</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2 tables, 1 from each data source that both have a Region field.&amp;nbsp; I also have an intermediate table linking these 2 tables together, defining a hierarchy for 3-4 other fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I try to pull Region from both tables, I get the craziest results.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way that I can keep the intermediate table to define the hierarchy and still pull region info from both tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 table is Savings and 1 is Spend.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-11-16T07:15:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Link Table</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Link-Table/m-p/1509124#M44070</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2 tables, 1 from each data source that both have a Region field.&amp;nbsp; I also have an intermediate table linking these 2 tables together, defining a hierarchy for 3-4 other fields.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I try to pull Region from both tables, I get the craziest results.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way that I can keep the intermediate table to define the hierarchy and still pull region info from both tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 table is Savings and 1 is Spend.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Link-Table/m-p/1509124#M44070</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-16T07:15:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Link Table</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Link-Table/m-p/1509235#M44071</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It sounds to me like you probably don't need the link table. Why not concatenate both tables? And have [%DataType] field to identify the data source for Set Analysis in UI&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let me know if it helps&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:31:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Link-Table/m-p/1509235#M44071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-19T17:31:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

