<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665251#M50052</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Sum() always returns a numeric value, i.e. - sum of nothing is also zero.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-14T07:23:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665243#M50049</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sum({&amp;lt;EmployeeID={"&amp;gt;3 &amp;lt;2"}&amp;gt;}[Sales Amount]) is giving me results for 0 and 1&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(Like invalid&amp;nbsp; range)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and Sum({&amp;lt;EmployeeID={"&amp;gt;1 &amp;lt;3"}&amp;gt;}[Sales Amount])&amp;nbsp; gives result properly for 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this a expected behavior&amp;nbsp; as I was expecting a between&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am using February 2019 ReleaseEnterprise edition.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So i am using like&amp;nbsp;Sum({&amp;lt;EmployeeID={"&amp;gt;3"}*{"&amp;lt;2"}&amp;gt;}[Sales Amount])&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665243#M50049</guid>
      <dc:creator>fabdulazeez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-22T20:29:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665247#M50050</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems that range itself is not right for integers. There is no integer between 3 and 2 (&lt;SPAN&gt;"&amp;gt;3 &amp;lt;2"), right?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:18:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665247#M50050</guid>
      <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T07:18:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665248#M50051</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah Invalid range. But i was expecting it return no values&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:19:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665248#M50051</guid>
      <dc:creator>fabdulazeez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T07:19:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665251#M50052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sum() always returns a numeric value, i.e. - sum of nothing is also zero.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:23:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665251#M50052</guid>
      <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T07:23:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665252#M50053</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I meant its returning value for employee 0 and 1.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:24:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665252#M50053</guid>
      <dc:creator>fabdulazeez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T07:24:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665255#M50054</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That should not happen. Could you share a sample app where you see this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:27:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665255#M50054</guid>
      <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T07:27:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665256#M50055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if you want to check&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SalesTable:&lt;BR /&gt;Load&lt;BR /&gt;MakeDate(2016+Floor(Rand()*2), 1+Floor(Rand()*12, 1)) as TimeStamp,&lt;BR /&gt;Round(Rand()*10000) as 'Sales Amount',&lt;BR /&gt;Floor(Rand()*4) as EmployeeID&lt;BR /&gt;autogenerate 100;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;than create a tabl with Employee id and Sum set analysis&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665256#M50055</guid>
      <dc:creator>fabdulazeez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T07:27:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665266#M50056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You may have noticed when interacting with Qlik, that making an selection that conflicts with existing selections clears the existing selections. Something similar may be happening here. The impossible range does not result in no values, but rather that the filter is not applied.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 08:03:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665266#M50056</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonathandienst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T08:03:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665267#M50057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;True . I was thinking the same, because it was giving output for second condition. In few Docs online i saw it as between.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to make sure&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 08:13:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665267#M50057</guid>
      <dc:creator>fabdulazeez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T08:13:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665294#M50059</link>
      <description>&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;The impossible range does not result in no values, but rather that the filter is not applied&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you notice, the values 2 and 3 (end points) are excluded from result, so it's &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;exactly&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;FONT face="courier new,courier"&gt;'filter not applied'. &lt;FONT face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif"&gt;However, your selection logic (clearing) something looks to me as a possibility.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665294#M50059</guid>
      <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T09:17:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665298#M50060</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yeah that's what i thought as it was giving output for second condition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically like second selection is excluded from first selection, first selection is removed and second selection is applied.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it's like that than i need to be more vigilant while writing set Analysis.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:23:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665298#M50060</guid>
      <dc:creator>fabdulazeez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T09:23:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665310#M50064</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As if it's working as OR condition instead of AND. That is, when the range looks to be a improper/impossible one, it uses OR in place of AND, the technicality of this evaluation I am not aware of. I don't remember if the case was so in old version of qlik engine, however in some cases new qlik engine is designed in such a manner that it applies it's intelligence to handle ambiguous scenarios ( I read&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6622"&gt;@hic&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;post, don't just recollect it now where), the same might be happening here; qlik engine is being intelligent here - since AND logic is not valid, therefore it is using OR logic.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665310#M50064</guid>
      <dc:creator>tresB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T10:23:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665355#M50075</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I created&amp;nbsp; simple app;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LOAD * Inline&lt;BR /&gt;[&lt;BR /&gt;Cat, Val&lt;BR /&gt;1, 10&lt;BR /&gt;2, 20&lt;BR /&gt;3, 30&lt;BR /&gt;4, 40&lt;BR /&gt;5, 50&lt;BR /&gt;6, 60&lt;BR /&gt;];&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And now I can see the OR behaviour. in a text box:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;=Concat({&amp;lt;Cat = {"&amp;lt;=2 &amp;gt;=5"}&amp;gt;} Cat, ',')&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;give 1, 2, 5, 6&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And this the same as an explicit OR:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;=Concat({&amp;lt;Cat = {"&amp;lt;=2"}+{"&amp;gt;=5"}&amp;gt;} Cat, ',')&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You learn something every day...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:54:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665355#M50075</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonathandienst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T11:54:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set Analyisis Boundary for integer diemension</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665396#M50087</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The format of the search string decides how the search is made.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&amp;gt;900&amp;lt;1000&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;will find all values greater than 900 and less than 1000&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;&amp;lt;900&amp;gt;1000&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;will find all values less than 900 or greater than 1000&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is described on&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://help.qlik.com/en-US/qlikview/April2019/Subsystems/Client/Content/QV_QlikView/Text_search_and_numeric_search.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://help.qlik.com/en-US/qlikview/April2019/Subsystems/Client/Content/QV_QlikView/Text_search_and_numeric_search.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you want a strict behaviour, you need to split it up into two different conditions, you like you already have done.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;HIC&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:57:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-Analyisis-Boundary-for-integer-diemension/m-p/1665396#M50087</guid>
      <dc:creator>hic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-14T12:57:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

