<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Your opinion on naming Measure same as Field in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Your-opinion-on-naming-Measure-same-as-Field/m-p/1787738#M61486</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6148"&gt;@rwunderlich&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is very poor practice to use the same name for a Measure and a Field, it will lead to a very messy application and in the long run a Qlik's site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hth&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 05:56:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ArnadoSandoval</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-03T05:56:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Your opinion on naming Measure same as Field</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Your-opinion-on-naming-Measure-same-as-Field/m-p/1787737#M61485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What's your opinion as to whether it's a good or bad practice to give a measure the same name as a Field?&amp;nbsp; Given that you can now use Measures in expressions it seems a duplicate name could make an expression confusing to read.&amp;nbsp; I'm thinking of flagging this condition a a bad practice in Document Analyzer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's your opinion and experience?&amp;nbsp; Do you ever name Measures the same as Fields? Like Sales &amp;amp; Sales?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 05:50:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Your-opinion-on-naming-Measure-same-as-Field/m-p/1787737#M61485</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwunderlich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-03T05:50:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Your opinion on naming Measure same as Field</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Your-opinion-on-naming-Measure-same-as-Field/m-p/1787738#M61486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/6148"&gt;@rwunderlich&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is very poor practice to use the same name for a Measure and a Field, it will lead to a very messy application and in the long run a Qlik's site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;hth&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 05:56:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Your-opinion-on-naming-Measure-same-as-Field/m-p/1787738#M61486</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArnadoSandoval</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-03T05:56:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Your opinion on naming Measure same as Field</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Your-opinion-on-naming-Measure-same-as-Field/m-p/1787989#M61500</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Some years ago I avoided it intentionally by applying multiple field-name rules by adding different prefixes/suffixes for keys, flags, measures and so on whereby measures got a # as prefix.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Later I removed this logic again because it's not easy to implement it in a consistent way especially by many various ad-hoc reports and a lot of quick &amp;amp; dirty adjustments which were later rather seldom cleaned and (well) documented (it's definitely not a good practice but so life is …). Further there were some confusion on the user side and repeating explanations to what and why. Therefore I had more efforts as benefits by such an approach and yes it resulted in multiple cases where the measure label and the field-name are identically. Of course it has some disadvantages but nothing what really caused problems or bigger efforts - especially as I use measure-references rather seldom and if mostly per column().&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Therefore I would more tend to inform the user that this behaviour may have disadvantages but not valuing it as good or bad practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ps. it's a pure QlikView logic - with master-items in Sense it may be different ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 16:04:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Your-opinion-on-naming-Measure-same-as-Field/m-p/1787989#M61500</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-03T16:04:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Your opinion on naming Measure same as Field</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Your-opinion-on-naming-Measure-same-as-Field/m-p/1788027#M61508</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I can relate to the challenges of doing something consistently, especially over the years.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, in Qlik Sense it does get a bit more complicated because of Master Measures.&amp;nbsp; In the expression:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sales - Margin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Sales" could refer to a Field, Variable, Master Measure or a column label in the chart.&amp;nbsp; Coloring in the expression editor identified which, but still may be confusing at first glance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Rob&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 17:54:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Your-opinion-on-naming-Measure-same-as-Field/m-p/1788027#M61508</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwunderlich</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-03T17:54:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

