<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Lookup vs Applymap in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Lookup-vs-Applymap/m-p/1991751#M82053</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Lookup() has more parameter as applymap() and could look into each table including the currently loaded one. The description within the provided link just explained the performance-impact but not really the cause.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't know how it's technically implemented but I wouldn't be surprised as if an applymap() worked like an exists() against the symbol-tables and doesn't break the load-execution while lookup() is applied against the data-tables and may be evaluated separately for each single record.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Beside this is the usage-hint within the description not the whole truth because applymap() could be used with combined and/or sorted fields and also horizontally + vertically nested with a bit advanced scripting. Therefore, there won't be much scenarios in which joins or lookup() are necessary or having a benefit against a mapping.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-10-12T11:45:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lookup vs Applymap</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Lookup-vs-Applymap/m-p/1991701#M82043</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can anyone explain why Applymap function is faster than Lookup function ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:47:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Lookup-vs-Applymap/m-p/1991701#M82043</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tanish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-12T09:47:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lookup vs Applymap</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Lookup-vs-Applymap/m-p/1991708#M82044</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/188612"&gt;@Tanish&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ApplyMap() is more practical since:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;even though you have to load the table, it will be dropped automatically.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;it makes code easier to understand&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Executed on the distinct values only, not per table record.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pls find the link below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.qlik.com/articles/000042949" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.qlik.com/articles/000042949&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 10:02:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Lookup-vs-Applymap/m-p/1991708#M82044</guid>
      <dc:creator>_Iswarya_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-12T10:02:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lookup vs Applymap</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Lookup-vs-Applymap/m-p/1991751#M82053</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Lookup() has more parameter as applymap() and could look into each table including the currently loaded one. The description within the provided link just explained the performance-impact but not really the cause.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't know how it's technically implemented but I wouldn't be surprised as if an applymap() worked like an exists() against the symbol-tables and doesn't break the load-execution while lookup() is applied against the data-tables and may be evaluated separately for each single record.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Beside this is the usage-hint within the description not the whole truth because applymap() could be used with combined and/or sorted fields and also horizontally + vertically nested with a bit advanced scripting. Therefore, there won't be much scenarios in which joins or lookup() are necessary or having a benefit against a mapping.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Lookup-vs-Applymap/m-p/1991751#M82053</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-10-12T11:45:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

