<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Set analysis in conditional functions in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-analysis-in-conditional-functions/m-p/2077900#M88411</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The case I have is a function that has the structure&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;Pick(WildMatch(Concat(....
Sum({&amp;lt; ... &amp;gt;}...))&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I see that sometimes the set analysis is only applied in specific conditions, which I recreate so that the user does not found these atypical cases, however, when asked to place one of these graphs as a tooltip in another, I must add more set analysis outside the aggregation function, that is in the conditional functions.&lt;BR /&gt;I have managed to solve what I needed by placing the set analysis into Pick function, but I would like to understand what would be the difference of placing it in WildMatch or in Concat.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;Pick({&amp;lt; field_sa &amp;gt;}WildMatch(Concat(....
Sum({&amp;lt; ... &amp;gt;}...))&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Luis A.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 14:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>landrei92</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-30T14:50:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Set analysis in conditional functions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-analysis-in-conditional-functions/m-p/2077900#M88411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The case I have is a function that has the structure&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;Pick(WildMatch(Concat(....
Sum({&amp;lt; ... &amp;gt;}...))&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I see that sometimes the set analysis is only applied in specific conditions, which I recreate so that the user does not found these atypical cases, however, when asked to place one of these graphs as a tooltip in another, I must add more set analysis outside the aggregation function, that is in the conditional functions.&lt;BR /&gt;I have managed to solve what I needed by placing the set analysis into Pick function, but I would like to understand what would be the difference of placing it in WildMatch or in Concat.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;LI-CODE lang="markup"&gt;Pick({&amp;lt; field_sa &amp;gt;}WildMatch(Concat(....
Sum({&amp;lt; ... &amp;gt;}...))&lt;/LI-CODE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Luis A.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 14:50:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Set-analysis-in-conditional-functions/m-p/2077900#M88411</guid>
      <dc:creator>landrei92</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-30T14:50:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

