<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Textbetween function in App Development</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Textbetween-function/m-p/2428721#M96388</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In general it should be performing quite fast because mapping is very fast and also string-functions don't need much processing-power. I don't remember of using textbetween(mapsubstring()) against larger data-sets but multiple and vertically/horizontally nested subfield(applymap()) are performing well in larger datasets.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Of course doing the loads without such transformations would be faster especially if the loads could be performed optimized. Maybe more relevant - are there any alternatives with a better performance? Rather not ... from a classical programming point of view the use of REGEX might be an alternatives but it will depend on a lot of circumstances and if an implementation would need some intermediate steps the possible faster string-preparation might not lead to a better overall run-time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Beside of the above if any possible you should apply incremental approaches on larger data-sets.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 12:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-08T12:29:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Textbetween function</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Textbetween-function/m-p/2428651#M96381</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does using &amp;nbsp;text between and Map substring slow down the app performacne if the volume of data is High? &lt;STRONG&gt;TextBetween(MapSubString('MapTYpe', PRIMARY_ATTRIBUTE_VALUE), '/', '\')&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;LI-WRAPPER&gt;&lt;/LI-WRAPPER&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 09:40:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Textbetween-function/m-p/2428651#M96381</guid>
      <dc:creator>Malanagaraj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-08T09:40:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Textbetween function</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Textbetween-function/m-p/2428721#M96388</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In general it should be performing quite fast because mapping is very fast and also string-functions don't need much processing-power. I don't remember of using textbetween(mapsubstring()) against larger data-sets but multiple and vertically/horizontally nested subfield(applymap()) are performing well in larger datasets.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Of course doing the loads without such transformations would be faster especially if the loads could be performed optimized. Maybe more relevant - are there any alternatives with a better performance? Rather not ... from a classical programming point of view the use of REGEX might be an alternatives but it will depend on a lot of circumstances and if an implementation would need some intermediate steps the possible faster string-preparation might not lead to a better overall run-time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Beside of the above if any possible you should apply incremental approaches on larger data-sets.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 12:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/App-Development/Textbetween-function/m-p/2428721#M96388</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-08T12:29:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

