<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Faster app level security rule ? in Management &amp; Governance</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1824837#M19940</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/48982"&gt;@thomaslg_wq&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Same issue on our side - we tried both (Groups and CP)&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From general Groups are evaluated faster - but we ran into second bottleneck - too many Active Directory attributes are import as User attribute. In some cases user has around 900 attributes which only 20 of them are related with Qlik security - however during Log in all of the groups are checked against security rules and we lose performance in HUB opening (around 40s in such cases).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Maybe you found a way to workaround this? Or you have better results with CP evaluation?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>e_petrasevicius21</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-07-27T12:44:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Faster app level security rule ?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1822722#M19883</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to know your ideas on how to create an app level security with the fastest security rule evaluation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some points about the environment :&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;OEM client with :&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;gt;100 end customers (groups of around 5 to 20 users)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;gt;100 streams : most of them specific for some customers, a few that can be shared across customers&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;gt;1000 apps&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&amp;gt;1000 users&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If we were doing some app level security with custom properties, we would have &amp;gt;1000 custom properties values&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;by user&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;or&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;by app&lt;BR /&gt;which is totally out of the Qlik recommmandations&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is there another way ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Are &amp;gt;1000 Active Directory Groups faster to evaluate than &amp;gt;1000 custom properties values ?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, how do you deal with large volume of users/apps and still have a good performance of rules evaluation ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;I may have an idea of how I am going to implement this but I want your fresh ideas first &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your ideas !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 13:11:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1822722#M19883</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomaslg_wq</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-16T13:11:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faster app level security rule ?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1824837#M19940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/48982"&gt;@thomaslg_wq&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Same issue on our side - we tried both (Groups and CP)&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From general Groups are evaluated faster - but we ran into second bottleneck - too many Active Directory attributes are import as User attribute. In some cases user has around 900 attributes which only 20 of them are related with Qlik security - however during Log in all of the groups are checked against security rules and we lose performance in HUB opening (around 40s in such cases).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Maybe you found a way to workaround this? Or you have better results with CP evaluation?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:44:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1824837#M19940</guid>
      <dc:creator>e_petrasevicius21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-07-27T12:44:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faster app level security rule ?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1828970#M20008</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Edgaras,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your input.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It has not been implemented yet, we are currently redesigning our whole Qlik platform, this question remains one of our main concerns.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How much faster would you say the groups are evaluated (how much % of improvement did you see with groups in app opening for instance ?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hear you on the second bottleneck... It seems there is no perfect way to do it..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I was hoping to find some good workarounds but my post did not drag much reponse, I guess we'll have to test various workarounds ourselves &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 07:06:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1828970#M20008</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomaslg_wq</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-08-17T07:06:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faster app level security rule ?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1866588#M20853</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys! How did this go for you?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are working on a similar project, so it would be interesting to hear about your findings&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 15:03:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1866588#M20853</guid>
      <dc:creator>gandalfgray</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-03T15:03:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Faster app level security rule ?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1867510#M20873</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/22807"&gt;@gandalfgray&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/48982"&gt;@thomaslg_wq&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is some information in the Help about this subject.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So that's a good place to start.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://help.qlik.com/en-US/sense-admin/November2021/Subsystems/DeployAdministerQSE/Content/Sense_DeployAdminister/QSEoW/Administer_QSEoW/Managing_QSEoW/QMC-performance-best-practices.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://help.qlik.com/en-US/sense-admin/November2021/Subsystems/DeployAdministerQSE/Content/Sense_DeployAdminister/QSEoW/Administer_QSEoW/Managing_QSEoW/QMC-performance-best-practices.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2021 10:52:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Faster-app-level-security-rule/m-p/1867510#M20873</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maria_Halley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-07T10:52:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

