<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Too Close Rebooting Confuses Scheduler? in Management &amp; Governance</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Too-Close-Rebooting-Confuses-Scheduler/m-p/2508714#M28885</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;BR /&gt;maybe if both the Manager+Worker node and the Worker node boot almost simultaneously (within 12 seconds in your case), they might enter a race condition where neither is properly elected as the active scheduler manager. Did you think to manually delay the startup of the Worker node or use a startup script to introduce a wait time?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 07:08:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>diegozecchini</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-07T07:08:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Too Close Rebooting Confuses Scheduler?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Too-Close-Rebooting-Confuses-Scheduler/m-p/2508691#M28882</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Folk,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Today, we had an issue where no tasks were getting run or scheduled.&amp;nbsp; It didn't matter if they were invoked from the QMC or a 3rd party REST service.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I look into the scheduler logs, I see the following message in the logs "Scheduler is not an active manager "&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="justindallasverizon_0-1741292901340.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/178237i3BF2D13D2AF022B5/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="justindallasverizon_0-1741292901340.png" alt="justindallasverizon_0-1741292901340.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I look at the boot time for the two schedulers, I see that they both started up within 12 seconds of one another.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My question is: Can two close of a boot time between 1 Manger+Worker node and 1 Worker node cause issues in finding who the master server is?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 20:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Too-Close-Rebooting-Confuses-Scheduler/m-p/2508691#M28882</guid>
      <dc:creator>justindallasverizon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-06T20:58:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Too Close Rebooting Confuses Scheduler?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Too-Close-Rebooting-Confuses-Scheduler/m-p/2508692#M28883</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/313964"&gt;@justindallasverizon&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;not sure on that, did they eventually start working on their own or did you have to do a server restart(s)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 21:06:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Too-Close-Rebooting-Confuses-Scheduler/m-p/2508692#M28883</guid>
      <dc:creator>David_Friend</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-06T21:06:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Too Close Rebooting Confuses Scheduler?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Too-Close-Rebooting-Confuses-Scheduler/m-p/2508697#M28884</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We restarted the schedulers on both servers, and it resolved..&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would it help to have both nodes as Manager + Worker or are we restricted to one Manager per setup?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 21:41:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Too-Close-Rebooting-Confuses-Scheduler/m-p/2508697#M28884</guid>
      <dc:creator>justindallasverizon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-06T21:41:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Too Close Rebooting Confuses Scheduler?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Too-Close-Rebooting-Confuses-Scheduler/m-p/2508714#M28885</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;BR /&gt;maybe if both the Manager+Worker node and the Worker node boot almost simultaneously (within 12 seconds in your case), they might enter a race condition where neither is properly elected as the active scheduler manager. Did you think to manually delay the startup of the Worker node or use a startup script to introduce a wait time?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 07:08:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Too-Close-Rebooting-Confuses-Scheduler/m-p/2508714#M28885</guid>
      <dc:creator>diegozecchini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-07T07:08:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

