topic Security rule in Management & Governance

Security rule

bknol — Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:23:06 GMT

Hi,

Is it possible to concatenate values in security rule conditions?

For example:

resource.name + "." + resource.app.name = user.<attribuut>

Or to use resource variables in matches expression like below?

user.<attribuut> matches ".*" + resource.name + ".*"

Bas Knol

Re: Security rule

korsikov — Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:27:24 GMT

As far as I know you can only use logical construction and

for example

resource.name="App_*" and (resource.app.name="appname")

Re: Security rule

amien — Sun, 11 Dec 2016 21:32:36 GMT

not possible yet? i really would like to have the basic functionality

Re: Security rule

Anonymous — Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:31:34 GMT

Any update on this? I'm very much in need of this functionality.

amien‌ bknol‌ were either of you able to solve this problem?

Re: Security rule

korsikov — Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:41:35 GMT

Do you try use like?

for expl..

resource.stream.HasPrivilege("read") and (resource.@DemoType like "Analyz*" and (user.@UserType="Demo" or user.userDirectory="DEMOAPP"))

Re: Security rule

analienx — Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:38:12 GMT

This wont help, basically there is a need for scenario like :

resource.attribut like resource + ".*" or something like that

Re: Security rule

mehmet_gencsoy — Mon, 14 May 2018 14:21:07 GMT

We also Need a solution for this issue. We want to match generic user.Group with custom properties. But user.Group contains additional string. So we Need the possibility to concat string before like: user.Group like "*"+resource.@Project+"*".

Please help. Thanks.

Mehmet.

Re: Security rule

Anonymous — Fri, 15 Jun 2018 17:45:07 GMT

Any update on this? We also really need this functionality. It seems I can't even use the value from a user attribute as the regular expression match - must be a static string.

For example, I'd like to be able to do this:

resource.name matches user.environment.clientAccess

...where clientAccess is a regEx expression with to match the valid resources this user can access.

Re: Security rule

caio_caminoski — Tue, 06 Aug 2019 13:46:07 GMT

Hi! Any solutions to this problem?

Thank you!

Caio

Re: Security rule

jlongoria — Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:14:11 GMT

This would definitely be helpful! Is there an official feature request in place already? If not, how do we get a feature request to the right people?

Re: Security rule

patricesalem — Fri, 01 May 2020 22:20:22 GMT

no solution yet ?

I'm also looking for a solution that will help me to share easily bookmarks between users...

(resource.objectType="bookmark" and resource.name like "*SHARE ALL*")
or
(resource.objectType="bookmark" and resource.name like user.name)

idealy : like "*" & user.name &"*"

thanks

Re: Security rule

alina_ricciuti — Tue, 06 Feb 2024 16:20:32 GMT

Hello,

Any news on this missing feature ?

@bknol , @all, did you found a workaround for the security-rules definition for this scenario ?

Thanks,