<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Persistence Type for Single Node Qlik Sense in Management &amp; Governance</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Persistence-Type-for-Single-Node-Qlik-Sense/m-p/1255951#M8544</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What Jai said is true. Keep in mind the difference between the two architectures (sync. vs shared) is related on who they connect the nodes to each other's (sync. replicate the infos on each node, shared use a central repo/FS shared between all nodes), so in a single node there is no difference on the two configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vincenzo_Esposito</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-14T13:57:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Persistence Type for Single Node Qlik Sense</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Persistence-Type-for-Single-Node-Qlik-Sense/m-p/1255949#M8542</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What persistence type is recommended for a single node Qlik Sense environment?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Persistence-Type-for-Single-Node-Qlik-Sense/m-p/1255949#M8542</guid>
      <dc:creator>jpapador</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-10T22:52:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Persistence Type for Single Node Qlik Sense</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Persistence-Type-for-Single-Node-Qlik-Sense/m-p/1255950#M8543</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;With Single node Sync persistence will work without any issues however you might want to go with shared persistence as Qlik is going to decommission shared architecture with next major release i.e. 4.0 in Jun release.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:26:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Persistence-Type-for-Single-Node-Qlik-Sense/m-p/1255950#M8543</guid>
      <dc:creator>jaisoni_trp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-10T23:26:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Persistence Type for Single Node Qlik Sense</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Persistence-Type-for-Single-Node-Qlik-Sense/m-p/1255951#M8544</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What Jai said is true. Keep in mind the difference between the two architectures (sync. vs shared) is related on who they connect the nodes to each other's (sync. replicate the infos on each node, shared use a central repo/FS shared between all nodes), so in a single node there is no difference on the two configurations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Management-Governance/Persistence-Type-for-Single-Node-Qlik-Sense/m-p/1255951#M8544</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vincenzo_Esposito</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-14T13:57:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

