<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Qlik BNF Terminal Definitions in Integration, Extension &amp; APIs</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Integration-Extension-APIs/Qlik-BNF-Terminal-Definitions/m-p/2071373#M18556</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am working on a python based parser of the Qlik Script Language in Lark. I was able to reconstruct the BNF from the JSON representation, however some of the Terminal definitions are just there as placeholders and not with their values. I imagine the Terminal definitions are loaded at runtime, and that's why they're not in the BaseBNF. I was wondering if anybody knew what Qlik considers the definitions of the following terminals:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;UNKNOWN&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SCANNER_TOKEN_MATCH_ANYTHING&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LITERAL_NUMBER&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;IDENTIFIER&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LITERAL_STRING&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LITERAL_FIELD&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a fairly good idea of&amp;nbsp; what these could be, but wanted my parser to be as faithful as possible.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For what it's worth, there appear to be a few mistakes in the BaseBNF representation, with some of the other terminals not having the appropriate flags for isBNFLiteral present in their object, but they're relatively easy to spot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Thanks so much!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 13:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jjfargus_psd</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-15T13:29:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Qlik BNF Terminal Definitions</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Integration-Extension-APIs/Qlik-BNF-Terminal-Definitions/m-p/2071373#M18556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am working on a python based parser of the Qlik Script Language in Lark. I was able to reconstruct the BNF from the JSON representation, however some of the Terminal definitions are just there as placeholders and not with their values. I imagine the Terminal definitions are loaded at runtime, and that's why they're not in the BaseBNF. I was wondering if anybody knew what Qlik considers the definitions of the following terminals:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;UNKNOWN&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SCANNER_TOKEN_MATCH_ANYTHING&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LITERAL_NUMBER&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;IDENTIFIER&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LITERAL_STRING&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;LITERAL_FIELD&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a fairly good idea of&amp;nbsp; what these could be, but wanted my parser to be as faithful as possible.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For what it's worth, there appear to be a few mistakes in the BaseBNF representation, with some of the other terminals not having the appropriate flags for isBNFLiteral present in their object, but they're relatively easy to spot.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Thanks so much!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 13:29:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Integration-Extension-APIs/Qlik-BNF-Terminal-Definitions/m-p/2071373#M18556</guid>
      <dc:creator>jjfargus_psd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-15T13:29:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

