<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: tDenormalize issues with to many rows in Talend Studio</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301720#M73790</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The size of the rows were fairly big which I think is the problem, seems to have a data cap of some kind.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;row example below, my goal was to have 100 of these separated by comma to be sent via an api call.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;{ "module": "c8eb72fd-a502-41b6-b96f-4926f92f500a", "id":"c8eb72fd-a502-41b6-b96f-4926f92f500a", "action": "c8eb72fd-a502-41b6-b96f-4926f92f500a", "data": {"id":"c8eb72fd-a502-41b6-b96f-4926f92f500a","agris_id_c":"430-072552-01","ds_settle_num_c":"002420","name":"430-072552-01","ds_net_bu_applied_c":"15000.0","ds_status_paid_c":"P","ds_date_deliv_sheet_c":"2020-07-14","ds_net_bu_customer_c":"15000.0","ds_number_c":"072552","ds_purch_sale_c":"P","ds_settle_loc_c":"430","settlement_agris_id_c":"P-430-002420-","ds_deduct_dollars_c":"93.75","PLACEHOLDER_remaining_dollar_discount":"93.75","ds_deduct_bushels_c":"0.0","PLACEHOLDER_total_application_unit_discount":"0.0","contract_agris_id":"430-P004889401","contract_short_agris_id_c":"P004889401","ds_commodity_code_c":"10","ds_advanced_amt_c":"0.0","ds_advanced_bu_c":"0.0","ds_apply_num_c":"01","ds_apply_num_reopen_c":"01","ds_contract_loc_c":"430","ds_contract_num_c":"0048894","ds_contract_price_c":"3.3","ds_contract_sched_c":"01","ds_cust_name_id_c_c":"H10621","ds_date_application_c":"2020-07-12","ds_date_avg_ticket_c":"2020-07-11","ds_date_pricing_c":"2020-07-08","ds_date_settlement_c":"2020-07-14","ds_gross_bushels_c":"","ds_in_out_c":"I","ds_location_c":"430","ds_non_direct_haul_bu_c":"15000.0","ds_reopen_status_c":"U","ds_status_estimate_c":"F","ds_status_priced_c":"P","ds_storage_table_c":"0","ds_type_c":"P","agris_createdby_c":"AJA","agris_createddate_c":"2020-07-14 11:04:00.0","agris_modifiedby_c":"AJA","agris_modifieddate_c":"2020-07-14 11:04:00.0","agris_sqlid_c":"80AA6D7C-9EF7-4210-8784-ABF80108D2DE","agris_tenantid_c":"05EE048D-413A-4A60-B962-AA9D017E0248","bean":"DSS01_DeliverySheets_Staging","operation":"insert"}}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any other suggestions on merging the 100 row batches separated by a coma would also be welcome, thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 15:37:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MRoss1652309981</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-12T15:37:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>tDenormalize issues with to many rows</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301718#M73788</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Running into an issue I did not see while using 7.2, when I get more than 40 rows back from the database tDenormalize returns blank, if under 40 it works as expected and combines the rows seperated by a comma. Thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="0695b00000Rh1ClAAJ.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/156632i157A42EDC0126D19/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="0695b00000Rh1ClAAJ.png" alt="0695b00000Rh1ClAAJ.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301718#M73788</guid>
      <dc:creator>MRoss1652309981</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-15T22:55:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: tDenormalize issues with to many rows</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301719#M73789</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I made a simple testing with v8.0.1 and I can't reproduce the issue, I use a tRowGenerator to generate 50 rows for testing. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="0695b00000Rh2zZAAR.png"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/138837i6FFADD09CAE51F48/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="0695b00000Rh2zZAAR.png" alt="0695b00000Rh2zZAAR.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Is it a job migrated from v7.2? Add a tLogRow between tMap and tDenormalize to print the data on the console, make sure there has data passed to tDenormalize.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From your screenshot, I see the status is 'starting...' , it seems there is a connectivity issue on the first component tDBInput..., the component is still running all the time?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shong&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 02:46:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301719#M73789</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-12T02:46:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: tDenormalize issues with to many rows</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301720#M73790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The size of the rows were fairly big which I think is the problem, seems to have a data cap of some kind.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;row example below, my goal was to have 100 of these separated by comma to be sent via an api call.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;{ "module": "c8eb72fd-a502-41b6-b96f-4926f92f500a", "id":"c8eb72fd-a502-41b6-b96f-4926f92f500a", "action": "c8eb72fd-a502-41b6-b96f-4926f92f500a", "data": {"id":"c8eb72fd-a502-41b6-b96f-4926f92f500a","agris_id_c":"430-072552-01","ds_settle_num_c":"002420","name":"430-072552-01","ds_net_bu_applied_c":"15000.0","ds_status_paid_c":"P","ds_date_deliv_sheet_c":"2020-07-14","ds_net_bu_customer_c":"15000.0","ds_number_c":"072552","ds_purch_sale_c":"P","ds_settle_loc_c":"430","settlement_agris_id_c":"P-430-002420-","ds_deduct_dollars_c":"93.75","PLACEHOLDER_remaining_dollar_discount":"93.75","ds_deduct_bushels_c":"0.0","PLACEHOLDER_total_application_unit_discount":"0.0","contract_agris_id":"430-P004889401","contract_short_agris_id_c":"P004889401","ds_commodity_code_c":"10","ds_advanced_amt_c":"0.0","ds_advanced_bu_c":"0.0","ds_apply_num_c":"01","ds_apply_num_reopen_c":"01","ds_contract_loc_c":"430","ds_contract_num_c":"0048894","ds_contract_price_c":"3.3","ds_contract_sched_c":"01","ds_cust_name_id_c_c":"H10621","ds_date_application_c":"2020-07-12","ds_date_avg_ticket_c":"2020-07-11","ds_date_pricing_c":"2020-07-08","ds_date_settlement_c":"2020-07-14","ds_gross_bushels_c":"","ds_in_out_c":"I","ds_location_c":"430","ds_non_direct_haul_bu_c":"15000.0","ds_reopen_status_c":"U","ds_status_estimate_c":"F","ds_status_priced_c":"P","ds_storage_table_c":"0","ds_type_c":"P","agris_createdby_c":"AJA","agris_createddate_c":"2020-07-14 11:04:00.0","agris_modifiedby_c":"AJA","agris_modifieddate_c":"2020-07-14 11:04:00.0","agris_sqlid_c":"80AA6D7C-9EF7-4210-8784-ABF80108D2DE","agris_tenantid_c":"05EE048D-413A-4A60-B962-AA9D017E0248","bean":"DSS01_DeliverySheets_Staging","operation":"insert"}}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any other suggestions on merging the 100 row batches separated by a coma would also be welcome, thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 15:37:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301720#M73790</guid>
      <dc:creator>MRoss1652309981</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-12T15:37:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: tDenormalize issues with to many rows</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301721#M73791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can also hard code on tJavaFlex to concatenate all the rows, for example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in begin part:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;String result="";&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the main part:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if(result.equals("")){&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;result=row1.columnName;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;}else{&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;result=result+","+row1.columnName;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the end part, store the value to global variable or context variable for used later.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;context.result=result;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 08:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301721#M73791</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-13T08:55:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: tDenormalize issues with to many rows</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301722#M73792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for all the help everyone, I was able to get around it with the xmlmap function&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 15:26:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/Talend-Studio/tDenormalize-issues-with-to-many-rows/m-p/2301722#M73792</guid>
      <dc:creator>MRoss1652309981</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-05-13T15:26:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

