<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: data modeling in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784516#M1026831</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;it will form snowflake schema. i know if i concatenate in to one it will give star schema. star schema will give better result? in optimization it is good?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>arulsettu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-25T06:15:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784514#M1026829</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; i am having around 10 transactional(fact) table in my DB. and many other master(dimensional) table. to form schema what is the best way either can i concatenate all transaction tables or any other way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please suggest some advice &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:51:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784514#M1026829</guid>
      <dc:creator>arulsettu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T05:51:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784515#M1026830</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If all fact tables are having particular KEY field which is common in between all fact then link Key will be better approach may be efficient way to do data modelling..ELSE concatenate all fact in one ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:57:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784515#M1026830</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T05:57:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784516#M1026831</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;it will form snowflake schema. i know if i concatenate in to one it will give star schema. star schema will give better result? in optimization it is good?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:15:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784516#M1026831</guid>
      <dc:creator>arulsettu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T06:15:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784517#M1026832</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;need advice on this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:23:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784517#M1026832</guid>
      <dc:creator>arulsettu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T06:23:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784518#M1026833</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PFA,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/docs/DOC-4556"&gt;Best Practices for Data Modelling&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it will help you..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:29:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784518#M1026833</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T06:29:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784519#M1026834</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arul,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to consider the data quality, granularity and performance.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes the star schema is good sometimes snow flake schema is good in performance. Check out best practices in data modelling to get good performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:32:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784519#M1026834</guid>
      <dc:creator>Siva_Sankar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T06:32:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784520#M1026835</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If u concatenate all 10 fact into 1 &amp;amp; build star schema but it will not give better performance. Because you simply adding number of record count into single table. Concatenate into single fact is good for small data size. If data size huge u need to think before simply concate all table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mukesh Chaudhari &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784520#M1026835</guid>
      <dc:creator>mukesh24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T06:52:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784521#M1026836</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Follow this document &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/docs/DOC-4556"&gt;Best Practices for Data Modelling&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 06:55:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784521#M1026836</guid>
      <dc:creator>sujeetsingh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T06:55:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784522#M1026837</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all thanks for replying my database is little huge. thats why i am asking if i concatenate i will better perfomance or is there any alternate suggestions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:00:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784522#M1026837</guid>
      <dc:creator>arulsettu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T07:00:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784523#M1026838</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If u r database huge i will suggest avoid concatenate, go for snowflake schema approach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:02:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784523#M1026838</guid>
      <dc:creator>mukesh24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T07:02:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784524#M1026839</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes.. if star schema is possible go ahead with that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784524#M1026839</guid>
      <dc:creator>vinay_hg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T07:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784525#M1026840</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arul,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*If your having same columns in all the tables then concatenation will be good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*If you don't have common columns then don't go with the concatenation, go with join .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:26:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784525#M1026840</guid>
      <dc:creator>avinashelite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T07:26:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784526#M1026841</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If u go for stars schema then u face performance issue.(Depend on u r datasize)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mukesh Chaudhari&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:27:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784526#M1026841</guid>
      <dc:creator>mukesh24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T07:27:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784527#M1026842</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Avinash,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;each table having common relation fileds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:33:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784527#M1026842</guid>
      <dc:creator>arulsettu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T07:33:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784528#M1026843</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arul,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* If your Fact Tables having Same Field Names and data then you go for Concatenation, it is better..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* If You are not Having Same data then you go for Link Table and performance wise better even though it is not Start Schema ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:45:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784528#M1026843</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T07:45:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784529#M1026844</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Arul,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then you can concatenate those 10 transaction&amp;nbsp; tables&amp;nbsp; by renaming the fields and using other tables build the data models. This will work fine&lt;IMG src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:53:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784529#M1026844</guid>
      <dc:creator>avinashelite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T07:53:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784530#M1026845</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3d3d3d; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"&gt;Hi Avinash,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3d3d3d; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; the database size is little bit huge so it wont be a problem&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 07:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784530#M1026845</guid>
      <dc:creator>arulsettu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T07:56:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: data modeling</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784531#M1026846</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;no, if the 10 tables have same number of columns and same columns then it will be no issues&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:07:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/data-modeling/m-p/784531#M1026846</guid>
      <dc:creator>avinashelite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-25T08:07:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

