<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: composite key? in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781152#M1035633</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Comment them out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-13T13:52:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>composite key?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781151#M1035632</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i have a 2 common fields between 2 tables when i reloaded i got synthetic key&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to remove synthetic key&amp;nbsp; i used like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;autonumberhash128(field1,filed2) as newkey&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;this statment i have written in 2 tables to remove synthetic key&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;here my question is after writing this statment do i need to comment those 2 common fields in any one table or not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;because when i go in this way like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;field1 &amp;amp;'_"&amp;amp; field2 as newkey (written same line in another table also) ,we use to comment fiedls in any one table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if we use autonumber means is it required to comment or not required?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if i did not comment whether data will come properly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:46:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781151#M1035632</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T13:46:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: composite key?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781152#M1035633</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Comment them out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:52:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781152#M1035633</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T13:52:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: composite key?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781153#M1035634</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's correct. You either remove those fields (comment them out) or you rename them so they all have different names. This will prevent qlikview from creating synthetic keys.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JV&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 13:52:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781153#M1035634</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvitantonio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T13:52:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: composite key?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781154#M1035635</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;but in my script it self&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;early they have created a composite key using autonumberhash128.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;they have written same line in both tables ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;not at all commented&amp;nbsp; fields in any table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;got result&amp;nbsp; why?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; is it possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:22:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781154#M1035635</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T14:22:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: composite key?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781155#M1035636</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;then they might have rename that field so that it may not get connect with the other table which will for &lt;SPAN style="color: #3d3d3d; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt;synthetic &lt;/SPAN&gt;keys.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 14:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/composite-key/m-p/781155#M1035636</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2015-01-13T14:27:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

