<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mapping LOAD with two fields, no processing - not optimized? in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Mapping-LOAD-with-two-fields-no-processing-not-optimized/m-p/67420#M11126</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been working on an app where several mapping LOADs used to take quite long. I changed the order of execution a bit and used a temporary table which is now loaded optimized, resulting in a mayor speedup for the whole thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The one that is taking the longest now is a mapping LOAD again with just two fields and no processing, coming from an "original" qvd (straight from SAP) via a relative path as is usual in our system. I wonder, why is this not optimized?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try, maybe with a PRECEDING LOAD or something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any idea why this is so?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DataNibbler&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 07:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>datanibbler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-08T07:55:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mapping LOAD with two fields, no processing - not optimized?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Mapping-LOAD-with-two-fields-no-processing-not-optimized/m-p/67420#M11126</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been working on an app where several mapping LOADs used to take quite long. I changed the order of execution a bit and used a temporary table which is now loaded optimized, resulting in a mayor speedup for the whole thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The one that is taking the longest now is a mapping LOAD again with just two fields and no processing, coming from an "original" qvd (straight from SAP) via a relative path as is usual in our system. I wonder, why is this not optimized?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will try, maybe with a PRECEDING LOAD or something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any idea why this is so?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DataNibbler&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 07:55:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Mapping-LOAD-with-two-fields-no-processing-not-optimized/m-p/67420#M11126</guid>
      <dc:creator>datanibbler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-08T07:55:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Mapping LOAD with two fields, no processing - not optimized?</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Mapping-LOAD-with-two-fields-no-processing-not-optimized/m-p/67421#M11127</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Curious - with a small temp_table, loading the mapping_table resident from this, the temp_table is suddenly optimized, running much faster, and the mapping_table is faster, too (the mapping in total now takes 6sec, it used to be 32).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the reason for this? Is this generally so? Can I write that in my "best practices" catalog as something that should be done?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 08:02:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Mapping-LOAD-with-two-fields-no-processing-not-optimized/m-p/67421#M11127</guid>
      <dc:creator>datanibbler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-08T08:02:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

