<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Filtering Dates : Dual Columns [From] &amp; [To] in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586208#M1115248</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your'e absolutely right that this is similar to a cross join. And that it is bad practice when it comes to &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;storing&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; data. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But here we have a case where the goal is to &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;allow analysis&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, to make it simpler for the user, and to decrease response times. If you then can trade some memory for response time (use more memory in order to decrease response time), you should absolutely do it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HIC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hic</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-14T09:04:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Filtering Dates : Dual Columns [From] &amp; [To]</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586205#M1115245</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Firstly 'Hello' !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 1.5em;"&gt;Secondly,&amp;nbsp; my first QV challenge.....&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a table box with 2 columns, dateFrom &amp;amp; dateTo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I am trying to achieve is for the user to select a month (e.g. March 2013), and my table will filter where (dateFrom &amp;lt; selectedMonthDate) AND( dateTo &amp;gt; selectedMonthDate)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also have a calendar table populated with a range of months (1st of every).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yet I am struggling to see how to establish the mechanism for my calculated filter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, being new, I might be tackling this from completely the wrong angle also !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any pointers. relevant tutorials, comments or advice appreciated !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:47:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586205#M1115245</guid>
      <dc:creator>simonb2013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-14T08:47:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filtering Dates : Dual Columns [From] &amp; [To]</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586206#M1115246</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basically you want to make the selection on a reference date that is between the dateFrom and the dateTo. The best solution for this is to create this reference date in the script. I describe how to do this in the following blog post:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.qlik.com/blogs/qlikviewdesignblog/2013/02/12/reference-dates" title="http://community.qlik.com/blogs/qlikviewdesignblog/2013/02/12/reference-dates"&gt;http://community.qlik.com/blogs/qlikviewdesignblog/2013/02/12/reference-dates&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HIC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:51:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586206#M1115246</guid>
      <dc:creator>hic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-14T08:51:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filtering Dates : Dual Columns [From] &amp; [To]</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586207#M1115247</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Henric, and thanks for the extremely swift reply !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've just read that start of your article, and if I read correctly, I'd basically be creating cross join table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i.e. 1 record for every month of (say) 5 years, for every item in my main table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;numberoforiginaldata rows * 12 * 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and if I wanted the user to select any day of the year over 5 years... numberoforiginaldataRows * 365 * 5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I may be double checking here because I am from a DB background where that would be considered bad practice .... but I also realise maybe I have to change my mindset now in the QV world !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:59:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586207#M1115247</guid>
      <dc:creator>simonb2013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-14T08:59:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filtering Dates : Dual Columns [From] &amp; [To]</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586208#M1115248</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your'e absolutely right that this is similar to a cross join. And that it is bad practice when it comes to &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;storing&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; data. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But here we have a case where the goal is to &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;allow analysis&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;, to make it simpler for the user, and to decrease response times. If you then can trade some memory for response time (use more memory in order to decrease response time), you should absolutely do it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HIC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586208#M1115248</guid>
      <dc:creator>hic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-14T09:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Filtering Dates : Dual Columns [From] &amp; [To]</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586209#M1115249</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, I'm going for it !&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 09:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Filtering-Dates-Dual-Columns-From-To/m-p/586209#M1115249</guid>
      <dc:creator>simonb2013</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-14T09:06:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

