<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: relative path performance in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/relative-path-performance/m-p/597461#M1120595</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you get performance issue with the relative path, you should better look to the infra, this is most probably issue dute to bad network trafic, i/o contention on file server, undersized or virtual NAS or SAN with bad configuration, you'll have the same bad performance with the absolute path.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway, you could bu the path(s) in a external file (txt, xls) and populate the pat in a variable during the load script in order to avoid asking QV to resolve the relative path, but I said just before the issue is somewhere else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>agilos_mla</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-02T17:14:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>relative path performance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/relative-path-performance/m-p/597460#M1120594</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;will there be any alternative to relative path what about the performance issue while using relative path.cant we go for variable set path.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mahesh T&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 15:25:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/relative-path-performance/m-p/597460#M1120594</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2014-02-02T15:25:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: relative path performance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/relative-path-performance/m-p/597461#M1120595</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you get performance issue with the relative path, you should better look to the infra, this is most probably issue dute to bad network trafic, i/o contention on file server, undersized or virtual NAS or SAN with bad configuration, you'll have the same bad performance with the absolute path.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyway, you could bu the path(s) in a external file (txt, xls) and populate the pat in a variable during the load script in order to avoid asking QV to resolve the relative path, but I said just before the issue is somewhere else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rgds,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/relative-path-performance/m-p/597461#M1120595</guid>
      <dc:creator>agilos_mla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-02T17:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: relative path performance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/relative-path-performance/m-p/597462#M1120596</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could use both alternative , there is no diference in the performance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;good luck!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fernando&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2014 17:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/relative-path-performance/m-p/597462#M1120596</guid>
      <dc:creator>fkeuroglian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-02T17:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

