<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: set analysis for for multiple conditions of the same field in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452775#M1159847</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bingo - Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-20T23:51:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>set analysis for for multiple conditions of the same field</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452772#M1159844</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to write a set analysis that shows me where a range of values DOES occur in table_1, field_a and&amp;nbsp; DOES NOT have another range of in the same tabe and field.&amp;nbsp; For example, Account ABC has an installed product listing like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, I want to see every account here that has product 234 or 789, but does not have product 12345 or 345.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Meyer - NO, has 234 but also has 12345 - ignore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adams - YES, has 234 and does not have 12345 or 345&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jones - NO, has 234 and 789 but also has 12345&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Smith - YES, 789 but does not have 12345 or 345&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" class="jiveBorder" style="width: 100%; border: 1px solid #000000;"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH align="center" style="background-color: #6690bc;" valign="middle"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Account&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TH align="center" style="background-color: #6690bc;" valign="middle"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Installed_Product&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;Meyer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12345&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Meyer&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;6789&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Meyer&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;234&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Adams&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;234&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Adams&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;6789&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Jones&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;12345&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Jones&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;6789&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Jones&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;789&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Jones&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;234&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Smith&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;789&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Smith&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;567&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:10:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452772#M1159844</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-20T21:10:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: set analysis for for multiple conditions of the same field</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452773#M1159845</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try something like&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;only(&lt;STRONG&gt;{&amp;lt;Account = p({&amp;lt;Installed_Product={234,789}&amp;gt;}) - p({&amp;lt;Installed_Product= {12345,345}&amp;gt;}) &amp;gt;} &lt;/STRONG&gt;Account)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:23:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452773#M1159845</guid>
      <dc:creator>swuehl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-20T21:23:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: set analysis for for multiple conditions of the same field</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452774#M1159846</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You need to operate with at least two sets. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The final set analysis would be more or less like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;{&amp;lt;Installed_Product={234,789}&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;Installed_Product={12345,345}&amp;gt;}&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For instance, to calculate the number of account that are the result of the difference between those two sets, you can use&amp;nbsp; count( {&amp;lt;Installed_Product={234,789}&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;Installed_Product={12345,345}&amp;gt;} distinct Account) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erich&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:32:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452774#M1159846</guid>
      <dc:creator>erichshiino</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-20T21:32:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: set analysis for for multiple conditions of the same field</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452775#M1159847</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bingo - Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452775#M1159847</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-20T23:51:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: set analysis for for multiple conditions of the same field</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452776#M1159848</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;12345, 345 need to be '12345, '345'...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:58:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/set-analysis-for-for-multiple-conditions-of-the-same-field/m-p/452776#M1159848</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-20T23:58:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

