<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic performance using numeric type vs. text type for keys in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/performance-using-numeric-type-vs-text-type-for-keys/m-p/328010#M120777</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, in my previous experience, I don't see the difference in terms of performance for keys I created use numeric field or text field. Does anyone know if there is a performance impact?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:51:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pjin_precima</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-11T16:51:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>performance using numeric type vs. text type for keys</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/performance-using-numeric-type-vs-text-type-for-keys/m-p/328010#M120777</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, in my previous experience, I don't see the difference in terms of performance for keys I created use numeric field or text field. Does anyone know if there is a performance impact?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks a lot&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:51:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/performance-using-numeric-type-vs-text-type-for-keys/m-p/328010#M120777</guid>
      <dc:creator>pjin_precima</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-11T16:51:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

