<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: synthetic key problem in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968961#M1220467</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It depends. In general you could avoid it by an appropriate renaming of your fields.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But it may lead to a missing or inappropriate association between your data. If this happens you may avoid it by combining these fields into another key-field whereby it looked as if it already happens with key-fields which are aimed to connect multiple tables per link-table together. This could mean that you need another link-table or even link-tables between link-tables ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This doesn't only sound complicated - it is complicated. Better is mostly a re-design of the data-model in the (officially recommended) direction of a star-scheme which means to merge all fact-tables into a single-table.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 06:35:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-16T06:35:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>synthetic key problem</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968948#M1220463</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How can i fix this&amp;nbsp;synthetic please?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Learnerr_0-1660629796111.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.qlik.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/86760i570D565B97ECF600/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Learnerr_0-1660629796111.png" alt="Learnerr_0-1660629796111.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 06:00:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968948#M1220463</guid>
      <dc:creator>Learnerr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-16T06:00:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: synthetic key problem</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968956#M1220464</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/144616"&gt;@Learnerr&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why can't you rename the field using alias name?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 06:26:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968956#M1220464</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lakshminarayanan_J</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-16T06:26:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: synthetic key problem</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968960#M1220466</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/92390"&gt;@Lakshminarayanan_J&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If i rename KEYHR and Key_Tarih how can i connnect these 2 fields with the necessary table?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 06:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968960#M1220466</guid>
      <dc:creator>Learnerr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-16T06:34:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: synthetic key problem</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968961#M1220467</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It depends. In general you could avoid it by an appropriate renaming of your fields.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But it may lead to a missing or inappropriate association between your data. If this happens you may avoid it by combining these fields into another key-field whereby it looked as if it already happens with key-fields which are aimed to connect multiple tables per link-table together. This could mean that you need another link-table or even link-tables between link-tables ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This doesn't only sound complicated - it is complicated. Better is mostly a re-design of the data-model in the (officially recommended) direction of a star-scheme which means to merge all fact-tables into a single-table.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 06:35:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968961#M1220467</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-16T06:35:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: synthetic key problem</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968972#M1220468</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/144616"&gt;@Learnerr&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. Try Using Alias Name ,if it is not suite you&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Try to concat 2 or more field and create the composite Key&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;3. Try to Join or concat as much as table you can&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;4. Else create a link table .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;for Link table creation you can check the youtube video which will guide you in step by step&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if any clarification you can reach us out and we will check on it&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2022 06:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/synthetic-key-problem/m-p/1968972#M1220468</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lakshminarayanan_J</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-16T06:55:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

