<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HANA vs SAP connector BW Speed in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/HANA-vs-SAP-connector-BW-Speed/m-p/779633#M1228481</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't recommend using ODBC connection with BW in any case. Many threads in the SAP connector group refer to the PROs and CONs of this matter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When BW is powered by HANA, I would expect&amp;nbsp; extraction should be fast with any connector (SQL, DSO, OLAP)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 02:36:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-06T02:36:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HANA vs SAP connector BW Speed</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/HANA-vs-SAP-connector-BW-Speed/m-p/779632#M1228477</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Qlikview enthusiasts, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was wondering if using ODBC to connect to HANA tables will be in any way faster then the traditional way of connecting to a SAP BW system using the Qlikview SAP connector. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Provided both tables has the same amount of rows and columns, but HANA being in-memory column based and all, will it be faster to fetch the same amount of data into Qlikview compared to using the QVSAP connector , QVSAP DSO connector or even the QVSAP OLAP connector ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Indexes and all other criteria aside, just a ballpark definition, will it be faster to fetch.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ram&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Malaysia&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 21:26:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/HANA-vs-SAP-connector-BW-Speed/m-p/779632#M1228477</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T21:26:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HANA vs SAP connector BW Speed</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/HANA-vs-SAP-connector-BW-Speed/m-p/779633#M1228481</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't recommend using ODBC connection with BW in any case. Many threads in the SAP connector group refer to the PROs and CONs of this matter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When BW is powered by HANA, I would expect&amp;nbsp; extraction should be fast with any connector (SQL, DSO, OLAP)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2014 02:36:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/HANA-vs-SAP-connector-BW-Speed/m-p/779633#M1228481</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-06T02:36:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

