<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Terrible performance SAP connector in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284106#M1229647</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Try to extract only required column only. because in each sap table there are lots of unnecessary column.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in case of increamental load take reference of header table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;E.g&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To extract delta from VBAP , take reference of VBAK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>suniljain</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-29T12:09:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Terrible performance SAP connector</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284101#M1229639</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of our clients is facing terrible performance when extracting data from SAP (SQL-Connector) from test system. Select * from VBAP takes 10 mins for 50'000 records. In total, 7 mio records are available in VBAP (~ 24 hrs for 7 mio records...). All possible parameters in connector are set (JobClass, Buffer Percentage, PacketSize). We use message server host - but same performance problem via application server host. QV support is involved but no progress so far.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAP core: 700&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CPU: 8 cores&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RAM: 10 GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Virtualized server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;QVCONN: &lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;QvSAPConnector.dll 5, 5, 8698 SR3&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Transports: &lt;SPAN lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;E6DK900099 / E6DK900086&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While loading data, only 2 CPUs are busy and 3 GB RAM are free.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SM50: Access to VBAP can be confirmed, but with an interval of 30 seconds only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The same 30 seconds interval can be monitored on level hard drive access.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of the time, SAP is busy with the QV programs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;QlikView gets ~ 5'000 records every 30-50 seconds.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;abap/buffersize&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 500‘000&lt;BR /&gt;r&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;sdb/cua/buffersize&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 100‘000&lt;BR /&gt;rsdb/esm/buffersize_kb&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8‘192&lt;BR /&gt;rsdb/obj/buffersize&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 256‘000&lt;BR /&gt;rsdb/otr/buffersize_kb&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4‘096&lt;BR /&gt;rsdb/esm/max_objects&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2‘000&lt;BR /&gt;rsdb/obj/max_objects&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 150‘000&lt;BR /&gt;rsdb/otr/max_objects&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2‘000&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Every idea or hint is very much appreciated! &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards, Marc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 21:26:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284101#M1229639</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marc_Kaiser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T21:26:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrible performance SAP connector</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284102#M1229640</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are some setings you could mess with in the connector string, like buffer sizes, etc. Check the connector manual for more information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, you should be doing an incremental load of VBAP table, you should check if there are any VBAK Date field indexed and use that doing a join with VBAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:32:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284102#M1229640</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielrozental</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-22T21:32:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrible performance SAP connector</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284103#M1229641</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Initially, we didn't touch the connection string. Only after facing the performance issue, we started modifying. e.g. we increased BufferPercentage to 50 (default = 10) but then the job in SAP stopped with errors ("not enough buffer space available - decrease buffer percentage used to 10 or a lower level..."). Also playing around with other parameters didn't increase the performance. So, we went back to default. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284103#M1229641</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marc_Kaiser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-22T21:49:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrible performance SAP connector</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284104#M1229643</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;have you tried doing an incremental extraction?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284104#M1229643</guid>
      <dc:creator>danielrozental</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-22T23:07:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrible performance SAP connector</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284105#M1229645</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try to limit the number of columns, selecting only the usefull ones to the Analysis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Avoid using SELECT * , when extracting data from any datasource. Its a good practice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284105#M1229645</guid>
      <dc:creator>pablolabbe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-29T03:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrible performance SAP connector</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284106#M1229647</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Try to extract only required column only. because in each sap table there are lots of unnecessary column.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in case of increamental load take reference of header table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;E.g&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To extract delta from VBAP , take reference of VBAK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284106#M1229647</guid>
      <dc:creator>suniljain</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-29T12:09:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrible performance SAP connector</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284107#M1229650</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We simulated an increment load - same slow performance but acceptable as we don't need to extract millions of rows (200'000 new / modified rows in VBAP per day). But before loading incremental, we need the initial (full) load. Looks like we slice the full load per month - for each table and month one separate extract. And then schedule 4 to 6 parallel jobs via publisher. that will take a couple of days to (fully) load the data from all the needed tables. And then set up incremental loads. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284107#M1229650</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marc_Kaiser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-04T20:41:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Terrible performance SAP connector</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284108#M1229653</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Marc,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;do you have already checked your SQL statement regarding performance issue. For example what kind of keys do you use in your SQL command. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check 1: Check that, if it is possible, you make a WHERE condition on a full index. Otherwise you will get a bad performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check 2: Check the amount of data in the origin SAP table. If possible reduce the amount of data e.g. WHERE conditon or SAP archive mechanism.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check 3: Create a performance trace and analyze the QV SAP connector in the SAP system to identfy your problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope it will help you a little bit &lt;IMG src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:15:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Terrible-performance-SAP-connector/m-p/284108#M1229653</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2012-03-12T22:15:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

