<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Direct Query RAM usage in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Direct-Query-RAM-usage/m-p/723547#M1261452</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you will look at the QlikView SR5 Reference Manual section 21.4 it will explain the in-memory model.&amp;nbsp; This is from the version SR7 manual.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When table fields are loaded with a Direct Discovery load statement (Direct Query), a similar table is created&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with only the DIMENSION fields. As with the In-memory fields, the unique values for the DIMENSION&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fields are loaded into memory. But the associations between the fields are left in the database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bill_Britt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-29T14:37:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Direct Query RAM usage</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Direct-Query-RAM-usage/m-p/723546#M1261451</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;QV Version 11.2 SR5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand that when using Direct Query, a user makes a selection and the script defined as Direct Query is executed agains the source database. The result set of that query is then returned to the user in the QlikView interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the result set is returned, is it loaded in to RAM? Does the RAM usage on the server increase with the result of the returned set?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Getting access to test this at my company will be difficult so any help from here would be much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Direct-Query-RAM-usage/m-p/723546#M1261451</guid>
      <dc:creator>trey_bayne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Direct Query RAM usage</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Direct-Query-RAM-usage/m-p/723547#M1261452</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you will look at the QlikView SR5 Reference Manual section 21.4 it will explain the in-memory model.&amp;nbsp; This is from the version SR7 manual.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When table fields are loaded with a Direct Discovery load statement (Direct Query), a similar table is created&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with only the DIMENSION fields. As with the In-memory fields, the unique values for the DIMENSION&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fields are loaded into memory. But the associations between the fields are left in the database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Direct-Query-RAM-usage/m-p/723547#M1261452</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill_Britt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-29T14:37:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Direct Query RAM usage</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Direct-Query-RAM-usage/m-p/723548#M1261454</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Bill but my questions is a little different.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. You reload a document. All in memory tables are loaded. The DIMENSION fields in Direct discovery 'tables' are loaded in but DETAIL and MEASURE are not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. A table box is created in the UI with fields from the DETAIL field.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. At first the table in the UI is empty.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. When a user makes a selection that is associated with a DETAIL field, the Direct Discovery function executes the call to the source database.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5. The database returns the set and in the UI the table box is populated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the .qvw bigger in RAM when the table box is populated?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:10:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Direct-Query-RAM-usage/m-p/723548#M1261454</guid>
      <dc:creator>trey_bayne</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-29T16:10:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Direct Query RAM usage</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Direct-Query-RAM-usage/m-p/723549#M1261456</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would think so. The data at that point is in memory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bill&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Direct-Query-RAM-usage/m-p/723549#M1261456</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill_Britt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-29T16:40:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

