<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Compatibility between 32bit QV desktop and 64bit QV Server in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Compatibility-between-32bit-QV-desktop-and-64bit-QV-Server/m-p/186755#M1281570</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;On #1, I believe the isnull() function behaves differently in 64 bit QlikView. I always use the len() function instead. If len(MyField)=0, then the field is null. That's all I'm thinking of. We develop on 32 bit machines and publish on a 64 bit server, and have had no problems. We don't use Oracle, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:38:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>johnw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-08T20:38:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compatibility between 32bit QV desktop and 64bit QV Server</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Compatibility-between-32bit-QV-desktop-and-64bit-QV-Server/m-p/186753#M1281566</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are developing QV documents on our 32 bit desktops (connecting to Oracle using the 32 bit drivers). Our QV server is 64 bit and running v9.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) Will we experience any issues when we deploy these to run on our QV Server?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) Do we have to install the 64bit Oracle drivers on the server or will 32 bit drivers run ok?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Compatibility-between-32bit-QV-desktop-and-64bit-QV-Server/m-p/186753#M1281566</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Compatibility between 32bit QV desktop and 64bit QV Server</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Compatibility-between-32bit-QV-desktop-and-64bit-QV-Server/m-p/186754#M1281568</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I exactly did the same thing this week in my current project. We had to move the server and QV both from 32 Bit to 64 Bit and I did not had any issues at all, even with the Drivers.. I think there will be an issue if you started with 64 Bit and trying to move on to 32 but other wise its just fine and I am happy to say this.. Please try it and let us all know if there are any issues.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ANDY&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Compatibility-between-32bit-QV-desktop-and-64bit-QV-Server/m-p/186754#M1281568</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2011-04-08T17:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Compatibility between 32bit QV desktop and 64bit QV Server</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Compatibility-between-32bit-QV-desktop-and-64bit-QV-Server/m-p/186755#M1281570</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;On #1, I believe the isnull() function behaves differently in 64 bit QlikView. I always use the len() function instead. If len(MyField)=0, then the field is null. That's all I'm thinking of. We develop on 32 bit machines and publish on a 64 bit server, and have had no problems. We don't use Oracle, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 20:38:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Compatibility-between-32bit-QV-desktop-and-64bit-QV-Server/m-p/186755#M1281570</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-08T20:38:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

