<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic QlikView IE plugin &amp; QVP pluggable protocol in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/QlikView-IE-plugin-QVP-pluggable-protocol/m-p/190238#M1285371</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I noticed there are two html files in the QvClients\QvPlugin folder of the QlikView server installation folder : opendoc.htm and opendoc_fix.htm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;opendoc_fix is not used by default, and after reading some posts in this forum i think it is just here to provide a way to auto-install the plugin in QlikView server 9. Is it correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is another difference between those 2 files : opendoc takes advantage of the QlikView pluggable protocol and directly set the url of an iframe to "qvp://documentURL", which makes IE to show the plugin inside the iframe, while opendoc_fix explicitly creates the plugin with an &amp;lt;object&amp;gt; tag with the QV plugin id, and sets the qvp url of the document inside a &amp;lt;param&amp;gt; tag.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does it make any difference in the end? I mean, is there a case where an opening method works but not the other one? Which one do I have to prefer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator />
    <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>QlikView IE plugin &amp; QVP pluggable protocol</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/QlikView-IE-plugin-QVP-pluggable-protocol/m-p/190238#M1285371</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I noticed there are two html files in the QvClients\QvPlugin folder of the QlikView server installation folder : opendoc.htm and opendoc_fix.htm&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;opendoc_fix is not used by default, and after reading some posts in this forum i think it is just here to provide a way to auto-install the plugin in QlikView server 9. Is it correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is another difference between those 2 files : opendoc takes advantage of the QlikView pluggable protocol and directly set the url of an iframe to "qvp://documentURL", which makes IE to show the plugin inside the iframe, while opendoc_fix explicitly creates the plugin with an &amp;lt;object&amp;gt; tag with the QV plugin id, and sets the qvp url of the document inside a &amp;lt;param&amp;gt; tag.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does it make any difference in the end? I mean, is there a case where an opening method works but not the other one? Which one do I have to prefer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/QlikView-IE-plugin-QVP-pluggable-protocol/m-p/190238#M1285371</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

