<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Another server with the same activation key in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162897#M1287956</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no technical conflict, based on what I know, but you will be violating your license terms by using keys on 2 servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In QV 9.0 landscape model, QlikTech has an "easy" pricing scheme for development/test QV server. I suggest you to talk to your account manager or QV Partner to sort this ot for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>disqr_rm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-31T19:52:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Another server with the same activation key</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162896#M1287954</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have QV server 8.5 and would like to install one more Server 9.0. I would like to enter the same activation key. Is there any conflict between 2 QV instances with the same activation key?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to install 9.0 only for testing purposes, after some time this new server become as main QV server.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Ramunas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162896#M1287954</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another server with the same activation key</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162897#M1287956</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no technical conflict, based on what I know, but you will be violating your license terms by using keys on 2 servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In QV 9.0 landscape model, QlikTech has an "easy" pricing scheme for development/test QV server. I suggest you to talk to your account manager or QV Partner to sort this ot for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:52:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162897#M1287956</guid>
      <dc:creator>disqr_rm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-31T19:52:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another server with the same activation key</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162898#M1287958</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you activate 2 server with the same activation key on the same domain the QVS service restart itself every 10 min&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:05:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162898#M1287958</guid>
      <dc:creator>avishaylevran</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-31T22:05:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another server with the same activation key</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162899#M1287960</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are considering a "second" server license for development/testing. Given differences between fat-client viewing of applications and the web-based Access Point, do you also recommend a second Publisher license? Or what do most folks do and how do they get around the viewing differences between the two?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162899#M1287960</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T20:53:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Another server with the same activation key</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162900#M1287961</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I use std publisher included in QV Server for testing QV reports in test/development environment. The standard accesspoint works great.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Another-server-with-the-same-activation-key/m-p/162900#M1287961</guid>
      <dc:creator>disqr_rm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-01T21:49:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

