<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance in QlikView in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273684#M1294249</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:46:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-25T14:46:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance in QlikView</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273677#M1294233</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a doubt about the best option for get the best performance in my QVW application. I have 5 options in my sheet, all of them use a similar table with the same dimensions and expressions (in this one, I only change a value for the tables). For a table, I use 18 expressions so, for all of them, I use 90!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My cuestion is about what option is better to get the best performance for my application. I have to create 5 tables or I have to create a table with 90 expressions?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273677#M1294233</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance in QlikView</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273678#M1294235</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's a difficult one. I'm not even sure that a single table with 18 expressions is even a good idea, let alone 5 of them. It all depends on the amount of data you put into these expressions. For example, the effect of splitting one object with 90 expressions in 5 with 18 expressions each may be minimal if they only process a few hundred pre-aggregated rows.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The best way to get an idea of the perfomance difference when handling your full set of records is to do a test: 1 table with 36 expressions vs. two objects with 18 expressions each. You can use the Calc time &amp;amp; Memory columns on the Sheet Properties-&amp;gt;Objects tab to get an idea about performance. I'm more inclined towards the latter...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:10:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273678#M1294235</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter_Cammaert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T09:10:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance in QlikView</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273679#M1294238</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;May be look at options to handle them at script. What the size of your data?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 23:15:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273679#M1294238</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-23T23:15:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance in QlikView</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273680#M1294241</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Beside considerations if really 18 expressions will be needed I would tend to use only one table which changed the dimension(s) dynamic to my selections.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Marcus&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273680#M1294241</guid>
      <dc:creator>marcus_sommer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-24T08:10:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance in QlikView</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273681#M1294243</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Jon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you really want to improve speed, I recommend you read this interesting document about QlikView optimization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;See u!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:19:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273681#M1294243</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-25T14:19:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance in QlikView</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273682#M1294245</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't remove data, I have 75MB in QVDs. The problem is that I have to work with them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273682#M1294245</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2016-11-25T14:41:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance in QlikView</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273683#M1294247</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the tutorial! It's very interesting!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:43:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273683#M1294247</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2016-11-25T14:43:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance in QlikView</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273684#M1294249</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:46:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Performance-in-QlikView/m-p/1273684#M1294249</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-25T14:46:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

