<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Access Point Performance in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Access-Point-Performance/m-p/244256#M1308567</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If you have enough of them open at once that your server starts swapping to disk, you get a huge slow down there, but hopefully your server isn't THAT overloaded.&amp;nbsp; Other than that, well, I'm not sure if the number would affect performance either.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The larger the application, the longer it will take to load, just like any other file.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;No idea.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've not tackled it as a specific issue.&amp;nbsp; Well, I guess in one case I sort of did, but it wasn't in Access Point configuration.&amp;nbsp; One application was particularly slow to load due to having many years of data, but most users only needed to see the current year.&amp;nbsp; So I created an extra QlikView with just the YTD data by doing a data reduction in Publisher.&amp;nbsp; So most users can click on the application that's much faster to load.&amp;nbsp; That's more of a workaround than a fix, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>johnw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-30T00:21:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Access Point Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Access-Point-Performance/m-p/244255#M1308566</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recently we have witnessed the performance getting worse and worse on Access Point.&amp;nbsp; I'm looking for some input on the variables that we might be able manage on the 'front-end' to improve it.&amp;nbsp; By performance, I mean that when a user enters the URL for Access Point, it can take a minute or more to present the dashboards.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Things we have considered possibly impacting the performance:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL start="1"&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Number of dashboards -- we have a growing number of dashboards...&amp;nbsp; we're not sure if the overall number affects the performance, or if the number of dashboards one user sees impacts performance&amp;nbsp; (many of our dashboards are published to a reduced distribution, so not all users see them)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The size of the dashboards -- we have seen an increase in the size of some of the dashboards.&amp;nbsp; It doesn't seem like this would affect the Access Point links though.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Using thumbnails versus the Details View&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Something else?&amp;nbsp; Has anyone else successfully dealt with thing kind of thing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Access-Point-Performance/m-p/244255#M1308566</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access Point Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Access-Point-Performance/m-p/244256#M1308567</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;If you have enough of them open at once that your server starts swapping to disk, you get a huge slow down there, but hopefully your server isn't THAT overloaded.&amp;nbsp; Other than that, well, I'm not sure if the number would affect performance either.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The larger the application, the longer it will take to load, just like any other file.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;No idea.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We've not tackled it as a specific issue.&amp;nbsp; Well, I guess in one case I sort of did, but it wasn't in Access Point configuration.&amp;nbsp; One application was particularly slow to load due to having many years of data, but most users only needed to see the current year.&amp;nbsp; So I created an extra QlikView with just the YTD data by doing a data reduction in Publisher.&amp;nbsp; So most users can click on the application that's much faster to load.&amp;nbsp; That's more of a workaround than a fix, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Access-Point-Performance/m-p/244256#M1308567</guid>
      <dc:creator>johnw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-30T00:21:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access Point Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Access-Point-Performance/m-p/244257#M1308568</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might want to look at the loading process using a HTTP debugger. A pretty neat one that attaches well to IE / Firefox is HttpWatch (see screenshot). There's a free version available.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="HttpWatch.png" class="jive-image-thumbnail jive-image" onclick="" src="https://community.qlik.com/legacyfs/online/5546_HttpWatch.png" width="450" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Another option would be a tool called Fiddler, which is another http debugger that lets you follow the loading process. I would then contact QlikView support (&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://www.qlik.com/us/services/support"&gt;http://www.qlik.com/us/services/support&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;) to see if they can help you sort things out.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:44:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Access-Point-Performance/m-p/244257#M1308568</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-30T00:44:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Access Point Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Access-Point-Performance/m-p/244258#M1308570</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This turned out to be a configuration issue.&amp;nbsp; We had the logs in our Access Point directory.&amp;nbsp; As the logs grew, every time someone opened Access Point, all of the directories and subdirectories were being scanned to look for QVW files.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once we moved the logs out of the Access Point directory, performance improved significantly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:48:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/Access-Point-Performance/m-p/244258#M1308570</guid>
      <dc:creator />
      <dc:date>2011-10-19T20:48:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

