<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: QlikView architecture recommendation in QlikView</title>
    <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/QlikView-architecture-recommendation/m-p/1746967#M1313758</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is not really something that can be answered via a Community post as there are a lot of factors that need to be taken into account to be sure the correct architecture is determined.&amp;nbsp; I would highly recommend you reach out to your account team and have a discussion around your need, they should be able to arrange for a discussion with the Services team or a Partner to assist you with things to be sure you get the correct solution for your current and future use case.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Brett&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 20:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brett_Bleess</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-24T20:38:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>QlikView architecture recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/QlikView-architecture-recommendation/m-p/1744447#M1313755</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We need to upgrade our QlikView environment and am looking for recommendations as to the architecture.&amp;nbsp; Our current configuration is two physical servers each with 1 TB of memory and two Intel Xeon 2.40 GHZ processors with 10 cores each.&amp;nbsp; Server 1 is running the directory, license, distribution, management, server, and web services.&amp;nbsp; Server 2 is running the directory, server, and web services only.&amp;nbsp; Based on this article&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView-Deployment/Qlikview-Server-and-publisher-services-on-multiple-machines/td-p/674044" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView-Deployment/Qlikview-Server-and-publisher-services-on-multiple-machines/td-p/674044&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;I was thinking of installing the web service on server 1 (above), server service on server 2 (above), and then adding a VM as server 3 to run the management &amp;amp; distribution services.&amp;nbsp; This article is 6 years old so I'm not sure how applicable it would be today.&amp;nbsp; Also, if my thoughts above are recommended, what should the VM configuration look like?&amp;nbsp; Please note that we are at times having tasks get queued due to only being able to run 9 tasks concurrently.&amp;nbsp; Thanks in advance for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 18:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/QlikView-architecture-recommendation/m-p/1744447#M1313755</guid>
      <dc:creator>michaeldbox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-26T18:19:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: QlikView architecture recommendation</title>
      <link>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/QlikView-architecture-recommendation/m-p/1746967#M1313758</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is not really something that can be answered via a Community post as there are a lot of factors that need to be taken into account to be sure the correct architecture is determined.&amp;nbsp; I would highly recommend you reach out to your account team and have a discussion around your need, they should be able to arrange for a discussion with the Services team or a Partner to assist you with things to be sure you get the correct solution for your current and future use case.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Brett&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2020 20:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView/QlikView-architecture-recommendation/m-p/1746967#M1313758</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brett_Bleess</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-24T20:38:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

